1980
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(80)90189-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alterations in the pattern of mastication after ablations of the lateral precentral cortex in rhesus macaques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, we have recently demonstrated that uni-lateral lesions of the wMCx dramatically affect the kinematics of whisker movements (Keller et al, 2001). A similar result was found in the monkey after lesions of the lateral precentral cortex, which affected the magnitude of mastication but not its underlying rhythmic nature (Larson et al, 1980). This suggests that rhythmic facial movements are generated by a subcortical pattern generator (Gao et al, 2001a) whose activity is regulated by cortical inputs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Indeed, we have recently demonstrated that uni-lateral lesions of the wMCx dramatically affect the kinematics of whisker movements (Keller et al, 2001). A similar result was found in the monkey after lesions of the lateral precentral cortex, which affected the magnitude of mastication but not its underlying rhythmic nature (Larson et al, 1980). This suggests that rhythmic facial movements are generated by a subcortical pattern generator (Gao et al, 2001a) whose activity is regulated by cortical inputs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…If the inhibition were to act on the CPG implicated in the pons activation, for example via GABAergic or glycinergic inhibitory premotor neurons (60,61), it has interesting implications for the role of the prefrontal cortex during the preswallow period: does the frontal cortex modulate the CPG directly, as previous evidence implies (49), via projections to the facial (62) or peritrigeminal (59,63,64) regions? Or does it circumvent the influence of the inhibition by controlling the oral preparatory phase independently, via innervation of the orofacial region by the motor cortex (49,50,65,66)? The two explanations are not mutually exclusive, and, if the frontal cortex did modulate the CPG directly, this response would represent an example of disinhibition rather than inhibition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3; upper images), (6) still image of the neck (still picture related to swallowing)‫ם‬control sound (NVCS) ( Fig. 3; lower images), (7) swallowing sound alone (SS) ( Fig. 4; upper images), and (8) control sound alone (CS) ( Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to studies in monkey, similar studies have been conducted in cat, rabbit, and rat 12) . These responses to stimulation of the cerebral cortex induce rhythmic coordination of the lower jaw and tongue that is similar to the overall chewing motion of animals; therefore, this brain region has been named the cortical masticatory area 7) . Takasoh et al 25) confirmed in humans that the cerebral cortex is involved in voluntary jaw motion (human voluntary bilateral-symmetric mouth-opening and closing movements) by using a motor readiness potential that reflects the cerebral programming process prior to voluntary motion.…”
Section: ) Primary Motor Areamentioning
confidence: 99%