2014
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00329.2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alterations of mouse lung tissue dimensions during processing for morphometry: A comparison of methods

Abstract: Preservation of original tissue dimensions is an essential prerequisite for morphometric studies. Shrinkage occurring during tissue processing for histology may severely influence the appearance of structures seen under the microscope and stereological calculations. Therefore, shrinkage has to be avoided so that estimates obtained by application of unbiased stereology are indeed unbiased. The present study investigates the alterations of tissue dimensions of mouse lung samples during processing for histology. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
67
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unstained uterus sample decreased in volume by 44.8%, while the stained uterus sample decreased by 19.2%. On the other hand, the unstained lung sample decreased in volume by 60.5% while the stained lung sample decreased in volume by 57.3%, which is consistent with the results presented previously [12]. This difference in volume change between the two tissue types is surprising and may be partially attributed to variations in the machine resolution for different scan parameters, segmentation errors, differences in tissue sample density and difficulty imaging the embedded, unstained lung tissue with micro-CT. Pre-embedded images of the unstained lung sample were acquired without problem, but the embedded sample poorly attenuated micro-CT X-rays, which made segmentation and volume measurements difficult and imprecise.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The unstained uterus sample decreased in volume by 44.8%, while the stained uterus sample decreased by 19.2%. On the other hand, the unstained lung sample decreased in volume by 60.5% while the stained lung sample decreased in volume by 57.3%, which is consistent with the results presented previously [12]. This difference in volume change between the two tissue types is surprising and may be partially attributed to variations in the machine resolution for different scan parameters, segmentation errors, differences in tissue sample density and difficulty imaging the embedded, unstained lung tissue with micro-CT. Pre-embedded images of the unstained lung sample were acquired without problem, but the embedded sample poorly attenuated micro-CT X-rays, which made segmentation and volume measurements difficult and imprecise.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As a result, the lung tissue would have been more likely to lose more fluid during the embedding process than either the uterus or mouse brain tissue, leading to the greatest decrease in tissue volume among the three samples. Such variation in tissue shrinkage could impact the accuracy of quantitative measurements in tissue [12]. Information on the shrinkage characteristics of the different tissue types that we initially gathered in this work gives valuable inputs for designing an experimental setup involving a larger number of samples to come up with an effective embedding protocol for each tissue type, such as using wax for embedding [11,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates lagged alveolar development, which matches the pathological characteristics of a new BPD displaying a pulmonary developmental disorder. Meanwhile, we must realize that there are pitfalls of the morphometric analysis using paraffin-embedded tissue because tissue-processing procedures may cause nearly 40% shrinkage of the lung tissue (48).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such instances, minor alterations to lung parenchymal structure may not be detected, or may be exaggerated, being either magnified or masked. To avoid this, a state-of-the-art analysis of the lung structure was undertaken (65). This analysis includes the preservation of lung structure, followed by SUR sampling, and a stereological analysis allowing for the determination of the total number of alveoli, septal thickness, and MLI (66).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%