2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered activity patterns and reduced abundance of native mammals in sites with feral dogs in the high Andes

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
93
1
13

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(64 reference statements)
5
93
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Several species were mainly diurnal, as previously reported for T. ornatus, M. frenata, D. punctata, and S. granatensis (Smythe 1978;Castellanos et al 2005;Jiménez et al 2010;Zapata-Ríos and Branch 2016) as were domestic and feral species such as dogs, cattle and horses (See Table 2); however, most species (M. rufina, D. pernigra, N. olivacea, C. semistriatus, L. wiedii, and C. taczanowskii) were found to be more active at night consistent with previous reports (Lizcano and Alvarez 2008;González-Maya et al 2009;Jiménez et al 2010;Zapata-Ríos and Branch 2016), and only few species were cathemeral (i. e., N. nasua and P. concolor). Preliminary data from our study indicate activity patterns of predators like P. concolor are partially concordant with the activity peaks of potential prey species (e.g., D. pernigra), which also was supported by overlapping of these species on the same localities, as previously reported for similar areas (Mosquera-Muñoz et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Several species were mainly diurnal, as previously reported for T. ornatus, M. frenata, D. punctata, and S. granatensis (Smythe 1978;Castellanos et al 2005;Jiménez et al 2010;Zapata-Ríos and Branch 2016) as were domestic and feral species such as dogs, cattle and horses (See Table 2); however, most species (M. rufina, D. pernigra, N. olivacea, C. semistriatus, L. wiedii, and C. taczanowskii) were found to be more active at night consistent with previous reports (Lizcano and Alvarez 2008;González-Maya et al 2009;Jiménez et al 2010;Zapata-Ríos and Branch 2016), and only few species were cathemeral (i. e., N. nasua and P. concolor). Preliminary data from our study indicate activity patterns of predators like P. concolor are partially concordant with the activity peaks of potential prey species (e.g., D. pernigra), which also was supported by overlapping of these species on the same localities, as previously reported for similar areas (Mosquera-Muñoz et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Elsewhere, variation in vicuña flight behavior was mediated by the presence of poachers (Donadio and Buskirk ) or pumas (Donadio and Buskirk ), which likely both occur in the CFPR, but rarely. On the other hand, observations in nearby Cotopaxi National Park, Ecuador, support a considerable effect of feral dogs just by their presence in the Andean ecosystem (Zapata‐Ríos and Branch ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dog activity closely matched that of humans; however, the presence of an evening activity peak exclusive to dogs indicates that their presence may be exacerbating the disturbance effects. Indeed, dogs often elicit stronger stress responses in wild animals than humans (Lord, Waas, Innes, & Whittingham, ; MacArthur, Johnston, & Geist, ), predate many local species (Young et al, ), and have caused temporal activity shifts in several other native forest mammals (Gerber, Karpanty, & Randrianantenaina, ; Zapata‐Ríos & Branch, ). Bearded pigs may be particularly sensitive to dogs due to a long history of using dogs for hunting in Borneo (Corlett, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%