“…DMN and visual dynamics were anti-correlated in HC, but this was lost in CI d’Ambrosio et al, 2020 | 62 people with RRMS 65 HC | People with CI MS had reduced TVC between subcortical network and DMN compared to CP MS, and spent less time in a connectivity state characterized by high FC strength |
Rocca et al, 2020 | 50 people with CIS 13 HC | People with CIS exhibited decreased TVC in networks hit by the clinical attack, and increased FC dynamism over two-years of follow-up |
Lin et al, 2020 | 25 people with RRMS 41 HC | In people with MS, higher stationary and dynamic interhemispheric FC between homologous regions was associated with higher scores at different neuropsychological tests |
Cordani et al, 2021 | 41 people with MS 46 HC | Increased TVC in sensorimotor and cognitive networks was found in people with MS following two weeks of action-observation training and, to a lesser extent, following control training |
Tijhuis et al, 2021 | 35 people with RRMS 19 HC | People with MS had higher global TVC compared to HC; in MS, TVC strength between the basal ganglia and DMN explained the presence/absence of fatigue |
Hidalgo de la Cruz et al, 2021 | 128 people with MS 40 HC | People with MS exhibited overall lower TVC, but also marginal increase of TVC in sensorimotor and cognitive networks vs HC in middle/highly connected states. TVC abnormalities were more severe in progressive MS and in CI MS people |
Bommarito et al, 2021 | 22 people with progressive MS 25 HC | Reduced TVC in the anterior DMN and increased TVC in the executive control network was found in people with progressive MS compared to HC. Decreased anterior DMN TVC explained cognitive disability |
Schoonheim et al, 2021 | 278 people with MS 41 HC | SPMS showed cerebellar connectivity changes, compared to RRMS and HC, including lower static FC in the fronto-parietal network and DMN, and higher TVC in dorsal and ventral attention, DMN and deep grey matter networks. |
…”