Altered behavioral and electrophysiological responses to social fairness in manic and euthymic patients with bipolar disorder

Ryu, Vin; Ha, Ra Yeon; Cho, Hyun Sang

doi:10.1002/brb3.2289

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 84 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Besides bvFTD, the original UG has been used to investigate SDM in different diseases, such as major depression, 18 19 bipolar disorder, 20 21 and schizophrenia. 22 23 Such studies have shown that neuropsychiatric conditions may impact social information processing, and these impairments may be related to biomarker parameters.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Age, but not education, affects social decision-making in the ultimatum game paradigm

Cassimiro,

Cecchini,

Cipolli

et al. 2024

Arq Neuropsiquiatr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Social decision-making (SDM) is often studied through gaming paradigms, in which participants allocate resources among themselves and others based on predefined rules. In an adapted version of the ultimatum game (UG), SDM behavior was modulated in response to the degree of fairness of monetary offers and the social context of opponents, designed to generate either prosocial or punishing behaviors. Objective To investigate whether SDM evaluated by the UG is affected by age and schooling, as it is relevant to know whether sociodemographic variables may bias UG results. Methods A total of 131 healthy adults participated: 35 young university students and 96 participants in Universidade de São Paulo's USP 60+ program (formerly known as Universidade Aberta à Terceira Idade, a program for people aged ≥ 60 years to attend university). The sample was divided into 3 age groups (17–22, 60–69, and 70–79 years) and 3 schooling groups (4–8, 9–11, and ≥ 12 years of schooling). Results Age and schooling did not affect performance in fair monetary offers. Differences were observed in the unfair conditions. The oldest group (70–79 years) accepted less frequently the baseline unfair offers (without social context), when compared with the 17–22 and the 60–69 years groups (17–22 = 60–69 > 70–79). Regarding the prosocial unfair and punishing unfair conditions, older adults accepted such offers more frequently (17–22 < 60–69 = 70–79). Schooling effects were not observed. Conclusion In the context of SDM, older adults may show prosocial behaviors more frequently than younger adults. The findings suggest performance in the UG is affected by age, but not by schooling.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Age, but not education, affects social decision-making in the ultimatum game paradigm

Cassimiro,

Cecchini,

Cipolli

et al. 2024

Arq Neuropsiquiatr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Social stability depends on a certain degree of fairness, and if the gap between rich and poor is too wide, society is likely to fall apart ( Ryu et al, 2021 ). However, in the actual distribution of benefits, in the face of the distribution results, there are always members who complain about the unfair distribution and thus denigrate the organization or even quit or turnover, while there are always members who quietly accept and identify with the organization regardless of the distribution.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differences in the moderating role of supervisors’ and subordinates’ cognition on distributive justice in the relationship between psychological contract and organizational identification

Shen

2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionIn the process of social exchange between employees and organizations, psychological contract, organizational identification, and cognition on distributive justice are closely related and have a common psychological basis, that is, the reciprocity of exchange. The question of how a sense of fairness can affect employees’ psychology and behavior has attracted the attention of scholars and managers.MethodsThe predictive role of psychological contract on organizational identification and the moderating role of supervisors’ and subordinates’ cognition on distributive justice in it were investigated. A paired sample of 133 supervisors and 437 direct reports collected from private service-based SMEs was analyzed through structural equation modeling.Results(1) relational psychological contract had a positive predictive effect on organizational identification and transactional psychological contract had a negative predictive effect on organizational identification; (2) subordinates’ cognition on distributive justice played a moderating role in the prediction of psychological contract to organizational identification, and supervisor’s cognition on distributive justice on subordinate’s psychological contract and organizational identification did not reach a significant level.DiscussionThis indicates that there was a significant difference between supervisors’ and subordinates’ cognition on distributive justice.

show abstract

I am entitled to it! Social power and context modulate disadvantageous inequity aversion

Hou

Meng

2022

International Journal of Psychophysiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Altered behavioral and electrophysiological responses to social fairness in manic and euthymic patients with bipolar disorder

Cited by 3 publications

References 84 publications

Age, but not education, affects social decision-making in the ultimatum game paradigm

Age, but not education, affects social decision-making in the ultimatum game paradigm

Differences in the moderating role of supervisors’ and subordinates’ cognition on distributive justice in the relationship between psychological contract and organizational identification

I am entitled to it! Social power and context modulate disadvantageous inequity aversion

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About