Altered functional connectivity in the motor network after traumatic brain injury

Abstract

Background: A large proportion of survivors of traumatic brain injury (TBI) have persistent cognitive impairments, the profile of which does not always correspond to the size and location of injuries. One possible explanation could be that TBI-induced damage extends beyond obvious lesion sites to affect remote brain networks. We explored this hypothesis in the context of a simple and well-characterized network, the motor network. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to establish the residual integrity of the motor network as an important proof of principle of abnormal connectivity in TBI.Methods: fMRI data were obtained from 12 right-handed patients and 9 healthy controls while they performed the finger-thumb opposition task with the right hand. We used both conventional and psychophysiologic interaction (PPI) analyses to examine the integrity of functional connections from brain regions we found to be activated in the paradigm we used.Results: As expected, the analysis showed significant activations of the left primary motor cortex (M1), right cerebellum (Ce), and bilateral supplementary motor area (SMA) in controls. However, only the activation of M1 survived robust statistical thresholding in patients. In controls, the PPI analysis revealed that left M1, SMA, and right Ce positively interacted with the left frontal cortex and negatively interacted with the right supramarginal gyrus. In patients, we observed no negative interaction and reduced interhemispheric interactions from these seed regions.Conclusions: These observations suggest that patients display compromised activation and connectivity patterns during the finger-thumb opposition task, which may imply functional reorganization of motor networks following TBI.

Dominant hemisphere functional networks compensate for structural connectivity loss to preserve phonological retrieval with aging

“…2006), motor networks (Kasahara et al. 2010), and memory networks in traumatic brain injury patients (Kasahara et al. 2011), syntactic performance in left hemisphere‐damaged patients (Papoutsi et al.…”

Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review

“…This interaction is generally interpreted in terms of an experimentally mediated change in (linear) effective connectivity between the area expressing a significant interaction and the seed or reference region from which the physiological variable was harvested. At the between-subject or group level, this reduces to a group difference between the regression coefficient that is obtained from regressing the activity at any point in the brain on the activity of the seed region [see Kasahara et al (2010) for a nice application]. It is this regression coefficient that can be associated with effective connectivity (i.e., change in activity per unit change in the seed region).…”

Detection of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Classification Using Resting State Functional Network Connectivity and Fractional Anisotropy

“…This difference could be because of the larger number of RSNs considered. In spite of early findings of altered deactivations in the cerebellum and sensorimotor areas, 48 little attention has been put into these regions in functional connectivity.…”