Lack of Relationship between Occupational Exposure to Carbon Disulfide and Endocrine Dysfunction: A Six-year Cohort Study of the Japanese Rayon Workers: Toru TAKEBAYASHI, et al. Department of Preventive Medicine and PublicHealth, School of Medicine, Keio UniversityObjectives-A six-year prospective cohort study was conducted to clarify whether the current carbon disulfide (CS 2 ) exposure level is low enough to prevent subclinical health impairment and/or to ameliorate health effects due to previous high exposure. This paper describes the follow-up results, exposure assessment, and effects on the endocrine system. Methods-The study subjects were 432 male workers exposed to CS 2 at one of the 11 rayon factories in Japan and 402 referent workers from the same factories, all of whom were examined in 1992-93. 251 CS 2 -exposed, 140 former-exposed and 359 referent workers participated in the follow-up survey (follow-up rate 89.9%) in 1998-99. Urinary 2-thiothiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid (TTCA) at the end of a shift as internal exposure index and the time-weighted average CS 2 concentration as external exposure index were measured twice a year from 1992-1993. By using various blood indices, we evaluated effects on thyroid, hypophysis, and gonad function, as well as effects on glucose metabolism. Information on potential confounding factors, such as age, smoking and alcohol drinking, were collected and adjusted for. ResultsWhen the individual exposure level was represented by arithmetic mean for TTCA and CS 2 concentration, Received July 31, 2002; Accepted Jan 24, 2003 Correspondence to: T. Takebayashi, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Japan geometric means (SD) of CS 2 workers were 1.61 (1.91) mg/g.crea and 5.02 (1.84) ppm, respectively. There were no exposure-related differences in glucose metabolism or any of the endocrinological indices. Conclusions-No biologically significant effects of CS 2 were found on endocrine function in Japanese rayon manufacturing workers when the average internal and external exposure levels were maintained below the current occupational exposure limit. (J Occup Health 2003; 45: 111-118)