1970
DOI: 10.1172/jci106283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered immunoglobulin metabolism in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
23
0
2

Year Published

1972
1972
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An important factor influencing serum Ig levels is the balance between synthetic and catabolic rate of different Ig isotypes. IgG catabolism is greater in patients with SLE than in patients with RA, whereas IgM catabolism is greater in RA compared to patients with SLE 35.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…An important factor influencing serum Ig levels is the balance between synthetic and catabolic rate of different Ig isotypes. IgG catabolism is greater in patients with SLE than in patients with RA, whereas IgM catabolism is greater in RA compared to patients with SLE 35.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Raised levels of IgG in the setting of SLE are clearly attributable to increased production (5). Indeed, catabolism of IgG is reported to be enhanced in SLE (12), leading to calculations that increases in the rate of production as great as 3-4-fold might be occurring (13). Relatives of patients with SLE also produce high levels of IgG in response to pokeweed mitogen (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each HRA and none of the control preparations was positive (Table IV). In both groups, the daily FCR (U/P) was consistent through study days [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] (Table IV). These results are discussed below (see Discussion).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The increased FCRs found by previous workers did not correlate with laboratory indices of disease, such as rheumatoid factor (RF) titers or erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESR) (5,6,10,11). One of these groups (11) Tables I and II list the characteristics of the subjects studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%