2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2020.111235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered power spectra in antisocial males during rest as a function of cocaine dependence: A network analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cha et al (2016), for instance, used a latent factor approach to delineate shared/unique neurobiological components of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD; Cha et al, 2016), where comorbidity of symptom characteristics has long been acknowledged (Hamilton et al, 2014). Similar modelling of shared/unique variance has rarely been undertaken within the externalizing domain (but see more rudimentary approaches recently undertaken by Denomme et al, 2018;Denomme & Shane, 2020;Simard et al, 2021), but may be equally informative for distinguishing the extent to which specific neurobiological abnormalities relate to core underlying antisocial characteristics, to consequences of an antisocial/substance-abusing lifestyle, or to shared latent factors. Indeed, HiTOP currently conceptualizes externalizing as composed of two higher-order factors (disinhibited/ antagonistic externalizing), and the triarchic model of psychopathy has conceptualized psychopathy as the higher-order factor of three subdimensions (boldness, meanness, and disinhibition).…”
Section: Latent Factor Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cha et al (2016), for instance, used a latent factor approach to delineate shared/unique neurobiological components of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD; Cha et al, 2016), where comorbidity of symptom characteristics has long been acknowledged (Hamilton et al, 2014). Similar modelling of shared/unique variance has rarely been undertaken within the externalizing domain (but see more rudimentary approaches recently undertaken by Denomme et al, 2018;Denomme & Shane, 2020;Simard et al, 2021), but may be equally informative for distinguishing the extent to which specific neurobiological abnormalities relate to core underlying antisocial characteristics, to consequences of an antisocial/substance-abusing lifestyle, or to shared latent factors. Indeed, HiTOP currently conceptualizes externalizing as composed of two higher-order factors (disinhibited/ antagonistic externalizing), and the triarchic model of psychopathy has conceptualized psychopathy as the higher-order factor of three subdimensions (boldness, meanness, and disinhibition).…”
Section: Latent Factor Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small amount of work outside the machine learning literature has moved in this direction. For instance, Denomme et al, 2018 used fMRI to identify regions related to enhanced cue reactivity in cocaine-dependent individuals, and undertook subsequent regression analyses to dissect the extent to which activity within each of these regions related more closely to continuously derived metrics of psychopathic traits (i.e., PCL-R total score) or substance use severity (i.e., years of lifetime use; see also Denomme & Shane, 2020;Simard et al, 2021). And utilizing a quite distinct approach, Hyatt et al (2019) created neuroanatomical profiles (based on their five-factor traits) on 1101 participants from the Human Connectome Project, and reported that while neuroanatomical profiles of Agreeableness and Conscientiousness showed medium-to-large relationships with externalizing psychopathology, neuroanatomical profiles of Agreeableness related more closely to metrics of antisocial behavior, while neuroanatomical profiles of Conscientiousness related more closely to metrics of substance abuse.…”
Section: Collect Data On Both Addiction and Antisocialitymentioning
confidence: 99%