Diffuse p53 immunostaining distinguishes 85% of serous (Type II) from endometrioid (Type I) carcinomas and is an independent marker for poor prognosis. Interobserver reproducibility for the diagnosis of these entities, as well as selection and prediction of p53 immunostaining results, is unknown. Reproducibility of three pathologists regarding: (1) a two (I and II) and (2) three part classification (I, II or indeterminate); (3) recommendation for p53 staining and (4) expectations of p53 staining results were computed with the kappa (k) statistic. All cases were immunostained for p53 and independently scored. A two and three tiered classification scheme achieved high (k ¼ 0.71) and moderate (k ¼ 0.49) reproducibility. Non-unanimous cases were more likely to be reclassified into an 'indeterminate' category (27 cases, 39% of passes) compared to those with unanimous (82 cases, 14% of passes) classification. Pathologists recommended p53 immunostaining with poor (k ¼ 0.28) reproducibility, but staining prediction was made with good concordance (69%, k ¼ 0.50). Moreover, p53 staining was more common in diagnostically discordant (46%) compared to concordant (16%) cases. A subset of endometrial cancers do not readily fit within a two-class system and can be culled from cases that (1) do not achieve interobserver concordance and (2) are more likely to be chosen for p53 immunostaining and (3) are more likely to stain positive for p53. Because p53 is an important marker for endometrial adenocarcinoma outcome, and cannot be predicted in advance in indeterminate cases, p53 immunostaining should be employed in cases with observer disagreement in a binary system. Keywords: p53; endometrial neoplasms; serous carcinoma; reproducibility Endometrial adenocarcinoma is a biologically diverse disease that has been divided into two subgroups based on histomorphology, biologic behavior, and underlying genetic aberrations. Type I tumors exhibit endometrioid morphology, arise in the setting of increased estrogen exposure with subsequent development of precancerous lesions (endometrial intraepithelial hyperplasia-EIN/atypical hyperplasia), are associated with frequent PTEN inactivation mutations, and have a favorable outcome. 1,2 By contrast, Type II tumors demonstrate papillary serous or clear cell morphology, are not associated with any known precursor lesions, demonstrate frequent p53 mutations, and are associated with a poor outcome. 3,4 The differences between these groups are summarized in Table 1. The observation that uterine papillary serous carcinomas have a greater tendency to metastasis and/ or recurrence in the peritoneum underscores the importance of accurate diagnosis. 5 Although the distinction between serous and endometrioid subgroups of endometrial cancer has a strong theoretical basis, subsets of endometrial adenocarcinoma have been recognized that do not fall cleanly into either of the two categories. Tumors with glandular architecture that more closely approximate endometrioid adenocarcinoma may occasionally demonstrate...