1994
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1994.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered stability of etoposide-induced topoisomerase II-DNA complexes in resistant human leukaemia K562 cells

Abstract: Summary K562 leukaemia cells were selected for resistance using 0.5 tiLM etoposide (VP-16). Cloned K/VP.5 cells were 30-fold resistant to growth inhibition by VP-16 and 5-to 13-fold resistant to m-AMSA, adriamycin and mitoxantrone. K/VP.5 cells did not overexpress P-glycoprotein; VP-16 accumulation was similar to that in K562 cells. VP-16-induced DNA damage was reduced in cells and nuclei from K/VP.5 cells compared with K562 cells. Topoisomerase II protein was reduced 3-to 7-fold and topoisomerase IIa and topo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
78
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, like kinamycin A and kinamycin C, the lack of kinamycin F cross resistance towards the K/VP.5 cell line (Fig. 7B), which contains one-fifth the amount of topoisomerase IIα compared to the parent K562 cell line [15,16], suggested that kinamycin F, like kinamycin A and kinamycin C [13], did not function as a topoisomerase II poison in cells. We and others have shown that topoisomerase IIα is highly sensitive to sulfhydryl-reactive drugs such as quinones [35,36] and cisplatin [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, like kinamycin A and kinamycin C, the lack of kinamycin F cross resistance towards the K/VP.5 cell line (Fig. 7B), which contains one-fifth the amount of topoisomerase IIα compared to the parent K562 cell line [15,16], suggested that kinamycin F, like kinamycin A and kinamycin C [13], did not function as a topoisomerase II poison in cells. We and others have shown that topoisomerase IIα is highly sensitive to sulfhydryl-reactive drugs such as quinones [35,36] and cisplatin [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine whether kinamycin F acts as a topoisomerase II poison, a comparison of the growth inhibitory effects of kinamycin F on K562 and the K/VP.5 cell lines was used. The K/VP.5 cell line contains one-fifth the amount of topoisomerase IIα compared to the parent K562 cell line [15,16], and can be a convenient test of whether a compound is a topoisomerase II poison [21]. Fewer DNA strand breaks will be produced in cells containing less topoisomerase II and thus, topoisomerase II poisons will be less potent towards the K/VP.5 cell line.…”
Section: Kinamycin F Inhibits Topoisomerase II Catalytic Activity Butmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 in which it was shown that the K/VP.5 cell line that has a 5-fold lower level of topoisomerase II␣ (Ritke and Yalowich, 1993;Ritke et al, 1994a) displayed minimal decreased sensitivity to cisplatin. It should be noted that because K/VP.5 cells were selected for resistance to etoposide (Ritke et al, 1994b), the adaptation of these cells may include events other than reduction of topoisomerase II␣ levels, such as reduced topoisomerase II␣ phosphorylation (Ritke et al, 1994a), altered stability of drug-induced topoisomerase II␣-DNA covalent complexes (Ritke et al, 1994b), and other undocumented genetic changes that may influence the resistance patterns to cisplatin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topoisomerase II-DNA covalent complex formation in intact cells was measured as described previously (28). Mid-log growth CHO and DZR cells were labeled for 24 hr with 0.5 Ci/ml [methyl-…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%