2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2023.137097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered static and dynamic functional network connectivity in post-stroke cognitive impairment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have identified 3 states of dynamic functional connectivity, which were in line with states described in previous literature, 15 -18,43,44 supporting the validity of the findings. Similar to Bonkhoff et al 15 investigating motor function, we found differences in state preference between stroke patients, who spent most time in the highly intra-domain connected state (= state 1), and HC, who preferred state 3 (weakly connected state).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have identified 3 states of dynamic functional connectivity, which were in line with states described in previous literature, 15 -18,43,44 supporting the validity of the findings. Similar to Bonkhoff et al 15 investigating motor function, we found differences in state preference between stroke patients, who spent most time in the highly intra-domain connected state (= state 1), and HC, who preferred state 3 (weakly connected state).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, better recovery of motor function was found to be associated with shorter times spent in a functionally integrated state (cfr our state 1). 26 Similarly, in cognitive stroke patients, longer mean dwell times for state 1 are reported by Yue et al 44 In contrast, Wang et al 17 described the opposite. However, differences in stroke patient characteristics are apparent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…To adjust the effects of head motions on functional images, we excluded participants with frame‐wise displacement (FD) of head motions >0.5 mm and head rotation >2° 18–21 . According to this criteria, nine participants were excluded from functional network analysis due to the head motions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To correct the head motion and To adjust the effects of head motions on functional images, we excluded participants with frame-wise displacement (FD) of head motions >0.5 mm and head rotation >2°. [18][19][20][21] According to this criteria, nine participants were excluded from functional network analysis due to the head motions. In addition, we also regressed out the head motion parameters to adjust the effects of head motions on functional image.…”
Section: Diffusion Tensor Imaging Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As demonstrated by our recent studies, the preprocessing steps included standard procedures for correcting slice-timing, normalizing spatially using a standard EPI template, smoothing spatially (4-mm Gaussian kernel), eliminating nuisance signals (head motion profiles, CSF signal, white matter signals, and local and global hardware artifacts), and filtering temporally within the frequency range of 0.01–0.1 Hz. Based on previous investigations, we excluded 8 participants who had head motion frame-wise displacement (FD) greater than 0.5 mm and head rotation exceeding 2° due to head movements 4447 . According to our recent study, the demographic and clinical characteristics were not significantly different between PD patients with DTI images and PD patients with preprocessed resting-state images (n = 74).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%