2014
DOI: 10.1177/0363546514549444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered Tibiofemoral Kinematics in the Affected Knee and Compensatory Changes in the Contralateral Knee After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Abstract: This study identified kinematic changes over time in both the ACL-injured and contralateral ACL-intact knees after ACL reconstruction. These kinematic adaptations could have important implications for postoperative care, including evaluating the optimal timing of return to sports and the development of bilateral neuromuscular rehabilitation programs that may improve patient outcomes and reduce reinjuries in both the short and long terms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
57
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One common criterion in evaluating a patients’ response is bilateral symmetry wherein the contralateral uninjured side serves as standard for evaluating the injured or repaired side . For example, when evaluating knee kinematics after anterior cruciate reconstruction, the operated leg is often compared to the contralateral uninjured leg . These side‐to‐side comparisons assume that prior to injury, the left and right side joint kinematics were identical, and any post‐treatment differences are due to the injury, imperfect surgical repair, or insufficient rehabilitation.…”
Section: Previous Studies Using Biplane Radiographs To Compare Patholmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One common criterion in evaluating a patients’ response is bilateral symmetry wherein the contralateral uninjured side serves as standard for evaluating the injured or repaired side . For example, when evaluating knee kinematics after anterior cruciate reconstruction, the operated leg is often compared to the contralateral uninjured leg . These side‐to‐side comparisons assume that prior to injury, the left and right side joint kinematics were identical, and any post‐treatment differences are due to the injury, imperfect surgical repair, or insufficient rehabilitation.…”
Section: Previous Studies Using Biplane Radiographs To Compare Patholmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, biplane radiography can track bone motion during dynamic activities with an accuracy on the order of 1 mm and 1° . Biplane radiography has been used to compare the affected knee and contralateral knees after ACL/PCL injury and after ACL reconstruction (Table ) . What is missing from all of these previous studies is evidence to indicate that the observed symmetry (or asymmetry) after surgery and rehabilitation is within (or outside) the normal side‐to‐side differences in kinematics that are found in healthy individuals.…”
Section: Previous Studies Using Biplane Radiographs To Compare Patholmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a small, but significant, shift toward external tibia rotation and medial tibia translation has been observed during locomotion in ACLR knees (Carpenter et al, 2009; Scanlan et al, 2010; Tashman, 2004), along with a potential progressive increase in anterior tibia translation (Hofbauer et al, 2014). It has been theorized that these abnormal kinematic patterns may alter cartilage loading patterns and thereby initiate a cyclic catabolic response that eventually leads to OA (Andriacchi and Mündermann, 2006; Chaudhari et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57 In particular, a number of publications report a shift toward external tibial rotation and medial translation in ACLR knees compared with healthy knees. 23,26 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,29 This sequence improves upon previous MRI efforts by allowing full volumetric co-registration for tracking skeletal motion, minimizing kinematic errors due to out-of-plane motion in planar images, and reducing numerical integration drift in phase contrast images. 28,38,42 However, it remains unclear whether abnormal ACLR knee motions seen in complex tasks 23,55 can be induced in an isolated task, particularly given the physical range of motion and loading constraints associated with motion in a standard MRI scanner bore.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%