2022
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered Transmission of Cardiac Cycles to Ductus Venosus Blood Flow in Fetal Growth Restriction: Why Ductus Venosus Reflects Fetal Circulatory Changes More Precisely

Abstract: We aimed to investigate the relation between the time intervals of the flow velocity waveform of ductus venosus (DV-FVW) and cardiac cycles. We defined Delta A as the difference in the time measurements between DV-FVW and cardiac cycles on the assumption that the second peak of ductus venosus (D-wave) starts simultaneously with the opening of the mitral valve (MV). As well, we defined Delta B as the difference of the time measurements between DV-FVW and cardiac cycles on the assumption that the D-wave starts s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the DV-S/D more precisely represents fetal pH than other parameters of cardiac cycles, likely because the DV-S/D might also be affected not only by cardiac cycles but also by altered vascular resistance and blood viscosity in FGR [21,22]. As such, the DV-S/D might more likely re ect fetal circulation volume, although the DV-PI might rather re ect cardiac congestion and/or myocardial compliance in at-risk fetuses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the DV-S/D more precisely represents fetal pH than other parameters of cardiac cycles, likely because the DV-S/D might also be affected not only by cardiac cycles but also by altered vascular resistance and blood viscosity in FGR [21,22]. As such, the DV-S/D might more likely re ect fetal circulation volume, although the DV-PI might rather re ect cardiac congestion and/or myocardial compliance in at-risk fetuses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%