2009
DOI: 10.1075/jhp.10.2.05nev
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altering distance and defining authority

Abstract: This article studies the use of nominal terms and pronouns as a means to refer to a third party, as well as to the writer him/herself and the addressee in written interaction. The purpose is to discuss the concepts of person reference and social deixis by looking at how the interactants' social identities and interpersonal relationships are encoded in the use of referential terms in Late Modern English letters and journals. The results show that the term friend may be used when the writer has something to gain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distance settings determine the closeness or how high the level of familiarity of a person with other people when communicating [29]. The interaction distance of the communication participants can be interpreted from the way the communication participants take distance when communicating.…”
Section: Room/place To Communicatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distance settings determine the closeness or how high the level of familiarity of a person with other people when communicating [29]. The interaction distance of the communication participants can be interpreted from the way the communication participants take distance when communicating.…”
Section: Room/place To Communicatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the project Unlocking the Mary Hamilton Papers, our approach to the study of forms of address chiefly builds on the research carried out on Early Modern English data by Nevala (2004Nevala ( , 2009, and is furthermore informed by Nevalainen and Raumolin-Brunberg (1995) and Raumolin-Brunberg (1996). More specifically, we are interested in using Nevala's (2004) detailed typology of direct address (e.g., "My dear friend") and subscription formulae (e.g., "ever yours affectionately"), as well as in mapping the politeness continuum identified for Early Modern correspondence onto the Late Modern period (see also Yáñez-Bouza & Oudesluijs, forthcoming).…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%