2022
DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3192411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternate Level Set Evolutions With Controlled Switch for Tooth Segmentation

Abstract: CBCT images have been widely used in digital orthodontics. In CBCT images, there are some tooth boundaries of blurriness and disappearance, and the teeth are of intensity inhomogeneity. In order to identify these boundaries and segment teeth, this paper develops an approach of alternate level set evolutions with controlled switch via slice-by-slice tooth segmentation: the user selects a voxel inside a tooth to initialize a small circle encircling the voxel, and the curve is automatically expanded until the too… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For tooth segmentation, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) metric is used to measure the similarity ratio between the tooth segmentation result and the ground truth. The DSC metric is defined in [31] by…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For tooth segmentation, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) metric is used to measure the similarity ratio between the tooth segmentation result and the ground truth. The DSC metric is defined in [31] by…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Gao & Chae (2008) applied the SLSM for tooth root segmentation, addressing challenges posed by complex image conditions and the issue of root branching. However, when dealing with tooth crown segmentation, especially for adjacent tooth crowns ( Jiang et al, 2022 ), the performance of SLSM may be limited by certain factors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Jiang et al (2022) alternately integrated the edge-based hybrid level set method with the geodesic active contour (GAC) method, controlling the evolution of these two models via a switch. Compared to several of the previously mentioned methods ( Gan et al, 2015 , 2018 ; Harrison et al, 2019 ; Jiang et al, 2019 ), this approach yields the smallest ASSD values (0.16 ± 0.08 mm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of this approach can be seen in active contour algorithms 12 14 and level sets 15 17 In active contour methods, the initial boundary must be determined by the user. In this method, the snake parametric model is used as a boundary energy minimizer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve the above problems, level sets methods have been presented. [15][16][17] Level sets methods are divided into two categories: edge-based and region-based. 18 In edgebased methods, the energy function based on edge information is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%