1976
DOI: 10.1177/107769907605300318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternate Methods of Measuring Public Radio Audiences: A Pilot Project

Abstract: General sample survey found more valid and only slightly more expensive than mail survey, phone survey and mailing list survey.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The emergence and adoption of various media (radio, TV), and the rise of academic departments of media and communication, prompted the development and application of research methods to better understand audience preferences and type. These included comparisons across survey and sampling approaches, and combining data from multiple sources, such as coded program content, surveys, census tract information, and/or industry reports (Hileman, 1953; Mickelson, 1943; Williams & LeRoy, 1976). Some articles involved naturally occurring field experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence and adoption of various media (radio, TV), and the rise of academic departments of media and communication, prompted the development and application of research methods to better understand audience preferences and type. These included comparisons across survey and sampling approaches, and combining data from multiple sources, such as coded program content, surveys, census tract information, and/or industry reports (Hileman, 1953; Mickelson, 1943; Williams & LeRoy, 1976). Some articles involved naturally occurring field experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, research has focused on the role of public radio, the challenges facing the medium, and funding (Avery & Pepper, 1980;Gray, 1986;Leidman & Lamberski, 1985;Miller, 1968;Mullally, 1980). Other research has examined programming and audience-measuring methods (Agostino, 1975;Bluebond, 1982;Stavitsky, 1994;Williams, 1977;Williams & Krugman, 1981;Williams & LeRoy, 1976;Woel, 1985).…”
Section: Background Literature and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 96%