1993
DOI: 10.1016/0305-0483(93)90042-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
12

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
68
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirdly, the proposed method enhances the discriminant power. This contribution may seem relatively minor, but it is worth noticing that it can generate a reasonable number of efficient DMUs and produce more realistic results in real-world applications because unconstrained weights on its inputs and outputs are usually unacceptable [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, the proposed method enhances the discriminant power. This contribution may seem relatively minor, but it is worth noticing that it can generate a reasonable number of efficient DMUs and produce more realistic results in real-world applications because unconstrained weights on its inputs and outputs are usually unacceptable [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to cope with these situations, the initial development of DEA was followed by a rapid evolution of value judgments in the assessment of efficiency followed as a natural by-product of real life applications (Allen et al, 1997). As a consequence, a great number of articles on DEA weight restrictions have appeared in the literature (Roll & Golany, 1993 The most commonly used weight restrictions are bounds on the ratios of weights. This approach has been named the assurance region method by Cooper et al (2000).…”
Section: Weight Restrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several ways to define that common set of weights is based on this idea. While imposing bounds for factor weights, Roll and Golany (1993) found out that the common set of weights can be defined by maximizing the average efficiency of all DMUs or maximizing the number of efficient DMUs. Kao and Hung (2005) applied a compromise solution approach to minimize the total squared distances between the optimal objective values (found by DEA) and the common weighted values (found by using common set of weights).…”
Section: Technical Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%