JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecology.Abstract. Understanding evolutionary consequences of intermittent breeding (nonbreeding in individuals that previously bred) requires investigation of the relationships between adult breeding state and two demographic parameters: survival probability and subsequent breeding probability. One major difficulty raised by comparing the demographic features of breeders and nonbreeders as estimated from capture-recapture data is that breeding state is often suspected to influence recapture or resighting probability. We used multistate capture-recapture models to test the hypothesis of equal recapture probabilities for breeding and nonbreeding Kittiwakes and found no evidence of an effect of breeding state on this parameter. The same method was used to test whether reproductive state affects survival probability. Nonbreeding individuals have lower survival rates than breeders. Moreover, nonbreeders have a higher probability of being nonbreeders the following year than do breeders. State-specific survival rates and transition probabilities vary from year to year, but temporal variations of survival and transition probabilities of breeders and nonbreeders are in parallel (on a logit scale). These inferences led us to conclude that nonbreeders tend to be lower quality individuals. The effect of sex was also investigated: males and females do not differ with respect to survival probabilities when reproductive state is taken into account. Similarly, there is no effect of sex on transition probabilities between reproductive states.
bischer and Wanless 1992). In other words, nonbreeders would be "prudent parents" (Drent andDaan 1980). However, at least two factors are likely to confound the measurement of trade-offs in the wild (Stearns 1992), and empirical studies have often revealed positive phenotypic correlations between components of fitness (Nur 1988, Reznick 1992, Viallefont et al. 1995a, Van Noordwijk and De Jong 1986). First, there could be differences in the amount of energy individuals acquire and allocate to various functions. In that case we might expect that some individuals would perform well in both reproduction and survival, whereas "bad breeders die sooner" (i.e., individual quality: Curio 1983). Second, there could be variations in resource availability across environments; if individuals are studied in environments where resource availability varies, individuals in better environments would exhibit higher reproductive and survival rates than individuals in poorer environments. The literature provides some examples where it has been suggested that nonbreeders are lower...