2017
DOI: 10.1002/rob.21742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternating landmark navigation of multiple AUVs for wide seafloor survey: Field experiment and performance verification

Abstract: This paper reports the results of the sea experiments and the performance verification of a navigation method for wide area surveys of the seafloor using multiple autonomous underwater and "Tri-TON." The performance of the method was verified using these AUVs through sea experiments and postprocessing simulation using experimental data. In addition, it was also verified that the performance of the method is comparable to high-grade conventional navigation methods, such as LBL or SSBL, through simulations of lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is advisable to carry out a group transition of the released AUVs to the working zone of a predetermined water area (the fourth stage T MAS1 ∈А MUC )) immediately after the release of the last group AUV. The beginning of the motion of each underwater vehicle in the group at a given depth of H MAS1, given course φ MAS1 and with a given speed v MAS1 should be a common team, which is drawn from the USV ACS or from the AUV-leader [17]. One of the main tasks of the automation of this maritime search mission phase is AUVs coordinated motion without loss, i. e. without the collision of the neighboring underwater vehicles (vehicles excessive close approach) and without losing the connection (communication) between them (vehicles excessive distancing).…”
Section: The Development Results Of Muc Control Automation Tasks 1 Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is advisable to carry out a group transition of the released AUVs to the working zone of a predetermined water area (the fourth stage T MAS1 ∈А MUC )) immediately after the release of the last group AUV. The beginning of the motion of each underwater vehicle in the group at a given depth of H MAS1, given course φ MAS1 and with a given speed v MAS1 should be a common team, which is drawn from the USV ACS or from the AUV-leader [17]. One of the main tasks of the automation of this maritime search mission phase is AUVs coordinated motion without loss, i. e. without the collision of the neighboring underwater vehicles (vehicles excessive close approach) and without losing the connection (communication) between them (vehicles excessive distancing).…”
Section: The Development Results Of Muc Control Automation Tasks 1 Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, no difference in efficiency was found among the navigational methods, except for the ALN. In the ALN, at least one AUV must land on the seafloor, and the communication time is required to alternate the landmark; hence, the efficiency worsened (Matsuda et al, 2018).…”
Section: Performance Evaluation: Comparison With Conventional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AUVs need to estimate their own position and pose accurately to conduct the surveying. We have previously proposed the ALN in which AUVs alternately land on the seafloor to act as a positioning landmark and support positioning of the other AUVs (Matsuda et al, 2012(Matsuda et al, , 2018. The ALN has the drawback because it requires one AUV must keep stationary on the seafloor.…”
Section: Surveying Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matsuda et al [49] developed navigation methods based on parent-child relationships to coordinate multiple AUVs in autonomous underwater surveys. In another work, Matsuda et al [50] developed a navigation method allowing multiple AUVs to conduct extensive seafloor surveys using alternating marker-based navigation. To facilitate identification, we summarized the initial identification of the above research in Table 1.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Path planning navigation assisted by terrain information [43] Autonomous SVM Single range only beacon navigation [47] Autonomous DL Utilize Microelectromechanical-system (MEMS) and Inertia-measurement-unit (IMU) navigation [48] Autonomous RL Develop Teach and repeat method Machine-learning (ML) navigation [49] Autonomous RL Develop Parent child ML method navigation [50] Autonomous RL Develop Alternating landmark navigation the nonlinear uncertainty residue from the modified linear data model and will be estimated collectively in the next control design process.…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%