2011
DOI: 10.1029/2010gl045932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternating mutual influence of El-Niño/Southern Oscillation and Indian monsoon

Abstract: Interdependence between El‐Niño/Southern Oscillation and Indian monsoon is analyzed with the use of Granger causality estimation from data for the period 1871–2006. Four different versions of the Niño‐3 and Niño‐3.4 index are used to check robustness of the results. We reveal a non‐symmetric bidirectional and even alternating character of coupling that extends previous knowledge about the presence of negative correlation and intervals of phase synchrony between the processes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical values of D are about 8 days for SST and 4 days for , depending on the location. GC is a powerful tool for the analysis of climate time series Kaufmann, 1999, 2014;Salvucci et al, 2002;Khokhlov et al, 2006;Mosedale et al, 2006;Mokhov et al, 2011;Attanasio et al, 2012;Pasini et al, 2012). It is especially useful in systems that exhibit feedback and closed loops, for which the lagged correlation can lead to misleading conclusions (Chatfield, 1989;Runge et al, 2014).…”
Section: The Gc Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typical values of D are about 8 days for SST and 4 days for , depending on the location. GC is a powerful tool for the analysis of climate time series Kaufmann, 1999, 2014;Salvucci et al, 2002;Khokhlov et al, 2006;Mosedale et al, 2006;Mokhov et al, 2011;Attanasio et al, 2012;Pasini et al, 2012). It is especially useful in systems that exhibit feedback and closed loops, for which the lagged correlation can lead to misleading conclusions (Chatfield, 1989;Runge et al, 2014).…”
Section: The Gc Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, X is Granger causal of Y if X helps predict Y at some time in the future. Then, the prediction improvement is measured by the Granger causality estimator (GCE) as in Mokhov et al (2011).…”
Section: The Gc Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of this kind have been applied in climate attribution studies to investigate the influence of one climatic variable on another, e.g. the Granger-causal effect of CO 2 on global temperature (Triacca, 2005;Kodra et al, 2011;Attanasio, 2012), of vegetation and snow coverage on temperature (Kaufmann et al, 2003), of sea surface temperatures on the North Atlantic Oscillation (Mosedale et al, 2006), or of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation on the Indian monsoon (Mokhov et al, 2011). Nonetheless, Granger causality should not be interpreted as "real causality"; one assumes that a time series A Granger causes a time series B if the past of A is helpful in predicting the future of B (see Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the leading modes of atmospheric variability exhibit nonlinear behavior [43,44] and can Inferring the directionality of coupling with conditional mutual information. in a nonlinear way [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%