2005
DOI: 10.1899/02-118.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative approach for establishing acceptable thresholds on macroinvertebrate community metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It supports the arguments for the applicability and robustness of this methodology in the establishment of biological criteria to discriminate between reference and impaired sites Maxted et al, 2000;Weigel, 2002;Ofenbö ck et al, 2004). However, some authors indicate the need for improvement of the methodology for data analysis, bioevaluation and biomonitoring, using macroinvertebrates (Barbour et al, 1995;Gerritsen, 1995;Smith et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It supports the arguments for the applicability and robustness of this methodology in the establishment of biological criteria to discriminate between reference and impaired sites Maxted et al, 2000;Weigel, 2002;Ofenbö ck et al, 2004). However, some authors indicate the need for improvement of the methodology for data analysis, bioevaluation and biomonitoring, using macroinvertebrates (Barbour et al, 1995;Gerritsen, 1995;Smith et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…All the possible source of errors must be minimized during the establishment of a multimetric index in order to obtain an ideal accuracy and an adequate reproducibility through time (Smith et al, 2005). The natural seasonal variability, associated to sampling problems and dubious interpretations of physical-chemical data, may become additional source of errors in an accurate classification of reference sites .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specular reflectance also occurs in wetlands dominated by lower biomass herbaceous vegetation when a layer of water is present [129]. Conversely, the radar signal is often increased in forested wetlands when standing water, such as flooding, is present due to the double-bounce effect, i.e., the radar pulse is reflected strongly by the water surface away from the sensor (specular reflectance) but is then redirected back towards the sensor by a second reflection from a nearby tree trunk [128,130]. Wetland InSAR is a unique application of the interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) technique that detects elevation changes of aquatic surfaces.…”
Section: Detecting and Mapping Wetlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, impairment or condition thresholds are established arbitrarily by dividing the data set into groups based on percentiles of the reference site range (e.g., <25th percentile of reference site samples; Hannaford & Resh 1995). Smith et al (2005) suggested that the use of tolerance intervals, that take data variability into account, would remove some of the subjectivity of using standard percentiles. In contrast, van Sickle et al (2005) used 2 SD of the mean of reference sites to define impairment in an O/E model for midAtlantic and North Carolina streams, United States.…”
Section: Development Of Condition Bandsmentioning
confidence: 99%