2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative buffer layers in Sb2Se3 thin‐film solar cells to reduce open‐circuit voltage offset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a thin buffer layer is anticipated to achieve outstanding solar cell performances. The optimum thickness of the buffer layer is selected to be 60 nm for the following calculations in this simulation work, which is consistent with the buffer thickness employed in the previous works [37,39,40]. In this simulation, the effect of the CdS donor density ranging from 1 × 10 12 to 5 × 10 18 cm −3 with 2000-nm-thick absorber (acceptor density of 3.7 × 10 18 cm −3 ), 60-nm-CdS, and 50-nm-FTO (donor density of 1 × 10 18 cm −3 ) is analyzed.…”
Section: Effects Of Thickness and Donor Density Of Buffer Layer On Cell Performancesmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, a thin buffer layer is anticipated to achieve outstanding solar cell performances. The optimum thickness of the buffer layer is selected to be 60 nm for the following calculations in this simulation work, which is consistent with the buffer thickness employed in the previous works [37,39,40]. In this simulation, the effect of the CdS donor density ranging from 1 × 10 12 to 5 × 10 18 cm −3 with 2000-nm-thick absorber (acceptor density of 3.7 × 10 18 cm −3 ), 60-nm-CdS, and 50-nm-FTO (donor density of 1 × 10 18 cm −3 ) is analyzed.…”
Section: Effects Of Thickness and Donor Density Of Buffer Layer On Cell Performancesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The work function values of 4.28 eV [38] and 5.15 eV [38] are employed for the aluminum (Al) as front contact and nickel (Ni) as back contact, respectively. The thermal velocity of 1 × 10 7 cm/s for electrons and holes in each layer has been put during the simulation work [37,39]. The surface recombination velocities for both electrons and holes are set to 10 7 and 10 5 cm/s at front contact 10 5 and 10 7 cm/s at back contact, respectively [36,39].…”
Section: Device and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, using the SCAPS-1D simulator, multiple Sb 2 Se [ [59] , [60] , [61] ] and Sb 2 Se 3 [ 62 ] based solar cell architectures with varying electron transport layers (ETLs) [ 63 , 64 ] and hole transport layers (HTLs) [ 65 , 66 ] have recently been explored, with reasonably good photovoltaic (PV) performance. Basak et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the interface properties of the Sb 2 Se 3 heterojunction, such as the photoincuded carrier dynamics at the interface, have not been insightfully investigated yet. Why the CdS buffer layer always produces better device performance than others (e.g., TiO 2 , ZnO, and SnO 2 buffer layers) and whether CdS is the best one are two urgent questions to be answered. , Therefore, further research is essential for a more systematic understanding of the carrier dynamics in the heterojunction, especially at the interface, which could lay a solid foundation for developing high-efficiency solar cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%