2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0044-8486(99)00333-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative competitive strategies in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): evidence from fin damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
61
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be the result of either using a more virulent strain or of the fact that, in the present study, salmonids were more susceptible to Tenacibaculum maritimum than turbot. Salmonids are competitive and will bite and harass each other when held in captivity (Mork et al 1999, MacLean et al 2000. The observed size difference of fish in each experiment would have contributed to this behaviour, which is likely to facilitate bacterial invasiveness, as damage to the epithelium would create a portal of entry for the bacteria to colonise and proliferate (Handlinger et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be the result of either using a more virulent strain or of the fact that, in the present study, salmonids were more susceptible to Tenacibaculum maritimum than turbot. Salmonids are competitive and will bite and harass each other when held in captivity (Mork et al 1999, MacLean et al 2000. The observed size difference of fish in each experiment would have contributed to this behaviour, which is likely to facilitate bacterial invasiveness, as damage to the epithelium would create a portal of entry for the bacteria to colonise and proliferate (Handlinger et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bitting between individuals can indicate an implementation of social hierarchy (Moutou et al, 1998). Mainly it happen in the time of serving feed (Maclean et al, 2000;Linnér and Brännäs, 2001;Ellis et al, 2002;Stejskal et al, 2011), when dominant fi sh restrain access to food to inferior fi sh (Ellis et al, 2002). Dominant fi sh are mostly huge individuals (Lemm et al, 1988;Maclean et al, 2000).…”
Section: Aggressive Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mainly it happen in the time of serving feed (Maclean et al, 2000;Linnér and Brännäs, 2001;Ellis et al, 2002;Stejskal et al, 2011), when dominant fi sh restrain access to food to inferior fi sh (Ellis et al, 2002). Dominant fi sh are mostly huge individuals (Lemm et al, 1988;Maclean et al, 2000). On the contrary, subordinate fi sh are smaller individuals and with reduced growth rate (Moutou et al, 1998).…”
Section: Aggressive Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations