1977
DOI: 10.1300/j075v01n01_04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative Evaluation Strategies in Work Settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1978
1978
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A more detailed description was neither requested nor given. A multiple baseline design across target item groups was used to assess the effects of the intervention (Komaki, 1977).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more detailed description was neither requested nor given. A multiple baseline design across target item groups was used to assess the effects of the intervention (Komaki, 1977).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the interventions were introduced at different points in time and performance improved only after, and not prior to, the introduction of each intervention, sources of internal invalidity such as history, maturation, and statistical regression were eliminated (Komaki, 1977). It is not likely that another extraneous event would have the same impact in two different departments at two different points in time.…”
Section: Safety Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research in this area might use the procedure recommended by Rubin (1973) to predetermine all participants who seek the training and then to randomly assign them to training (A) versus comparison (B) conditions on an ABBAABBA basis. Similarly, all of the subjects can eventually be exposed to training using a multiple-baseline design (Komaki, 1977) …”
Section: Journal Of Applied Communication Research Maymentioning
confidence: 99%