2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2008.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative financing for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT): The case of Porto Alegre, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Curitiba achieved what other cities in Brazil did not when facing similar opportunities. Cities like São Paulo, Belo Horizonte, Recife, Porto Alegre, and Rio de Janeiro used the federal funding available in the 1970s for bus systems' performance improvements only (Lindau et al 2008), whereas Curitiba used the investment opportunity to direct the city's urban development.…”
Section: Making Buses Run Like Surface Metro-curitiba 1982mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curitiba achieved what other cities in Brazil did not when facing similar opportunities. Cities like São Paulo, Belo Horizonte, Recife, Porto Alegre, and Rio de Janeiro used the federal funding available in the 1970s for bus systems' performance improvements only (Lindau et al 2008), whereas Curitiba used the investment opportunity to direct the city's urban development.…”
Section: Making Buses Run Like Surface Metro-curitiba 1982mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such connections and the interactions involved could be studied from different perspectives. In fact, BRT systems have been approached from an institutional perspective (Lámbarry Vilchis et al, 2011Vilchis et al, , 2010Ponnaluri, 2011), a social perspective (Cahill Delmelle and Casas, 2012;Lin and Wu, 2007), an economic perspective (Cervero and Kang, 2011;Hensher and Golob, 2008;Lindau et al , 2008), an urban planning perspective (Ardila-Gómez, 2004), a technical perspective (Hensher and Golob, 2008;, and an environmental perspective (Nugroho et al, 2010;Wöhrnschimmel et al, 2008).…”
Section: Bus Rapid Transit (Brt): Previous Studies Contribution and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BRT systems have been approached from an institutional perspective (Filipe and Macario 2013;Lámbarry Vilchis et al 2010), a social perspective (Delmelle and Casas 2012;Lin and Wu 2007), an economic perspective (Cervero and Kang 2011;Hensher and Golob 2008;Lindau et al 2008), an urban planning perspective (Gómez 2004), an environmental perspective (Wöhrnschimmel et al 2008), and a technical perspective (Hensher and Golob 2008;Hidalgo et al 2012). All these authors agree that the BRT concept could be a feasible solution for many cities' mobility problems and, furthermore, that "there is a lack of studies analyzing the connection among the implementing venues, the transmission of ideas from one to the other, and the impact that incremental improvements have had on the geographical expansion of the concept" (Mejia-Dugand et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%