2019
DOI: 10.1002/jts.22469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative Models of DSM‐5 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Portuguese Adolescents Exposed to Trauma and Childhood Adversity

Abstract: The factor structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been extensively debated, with evidence supporting the recently proposed seven-factor hybrid model. However, few studies examining PTSD symptom structure have assessed the implications of these proposed models on diagnostic criteria and PTSD prevalence. In the present study, we examined seven alternative DSM-5 PTSD models within a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), using the Child PTSD Symptom Scale-Self-Report for DSM-5 (CPSS-5). Addition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
7
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, mean symptom levels in this sample ( M = 25.46, SD = 17.17) were markedly higher than those reported in previous community‐based studies (e.g., Stewart et al., 2017; Venta & Mercado, 2019) as well as those that specifically selected for participants with a history of PTEs (Correia‐Santos et al., 2019; Meyer et al., 2015; Serrano‐Ibanez et al., 2018). Only Foa et al.’s (2018) validation sample, which included previous exposure to a Criterion A PTE as a selection criterion, reported higher levels of PTSS ( M = 32.67, SD = 18.97) than the present sample.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, mean symptom levels in this sample ( M = 25.46, SD = 17.17) were markedly higher than those reported in previous community‐based studies (e.g., Stewart et al., 2017; Venta & Mercado, 2019) as well as those that specifically selected for participants with a history of PTEs (Correia‐Santos et al., 2019; Meyer et al., 2015; Serrano‐Ibanez et al., 2018). Only Foa et al.’s (2018) validation sample, which included previous exposure to a Criterion A PTE as a selection criterion, reported higher levels of PTSS ( M = 32.67, SD = 18.97) than the present sample.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…The primary analysis in the current sample was a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the 20 PTSS items, using the four‐factor DSM‐5 model implemented in previous studies (Correia‐Santos et al., 2019; Meyer et al., 2015; Serrano‐Ibanez et al., 2017). Given the ordinal, Likert‐type structure of the data, a polychoric correlation matrix (Holgado‐Tello et al., 2010; Li, 2016) and robust weighted least squares with mean and variance adjustment (WLSMV) estimator were used, per established recommendations (Flora & Curran, 2004; Muthén et al., 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5; Weathers et al, 2013; Portuguese version, Correia-Santos et al, 2017) is a self-report measure developed to evaluate traumatic events in an individual's life according to the DSM–5 . It evaluates exposure to 14 potentially traumatic events (e.g., natural disasters, accidents, sexual assault) and includes an additional item where respondents could report another traumatic event that was not listed in the 14 previous items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study is part of a larger longitudinal research project on the impact of traumatic events on adolescents in the North of Portugal (27)(28)(29). All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the APA ethical standards.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%