2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative paradigms and the study and practice of performance management and evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
53
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Further categorisations thus include critical research as a third categorythereby offering a trisection of approaches. This categorisation can again be found in both HR (e.g., McKenna et al 2011) andIS research (e.g., Cecez-Kecmanovic, 2011;Orlikowski and Baroudi 1991). This consideration of an additional research approach doubtlessly adds to the completeness of the categorisation.…”
Section: Categories Of Research Approachesmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further categorisations thus include critical research as a third categorythereby offering a trisection of approaches. This categorisation can again be found in both HR (e.g., McKenna et al 2011) andIS research (e.g., Cecez-Kecmanovic, 2011;Orlikowski and Baroudi 1991). This consideration of an additional research approach doubtlessly adds to the completeness of the categorisation.…”
Section: Categories Of Research Approachesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This should greatly expand the perspective on the investigated question-and additionally deepen the insights on the potential and limitations of the respective research approaches (cf. the example of multi-paradigmatic work in HR research by McKenna et al 2011). This could be realised through the cooperation of researchers with different paradigmatic orientations because a realisation by a single researcher might be limited by the high demands of being an expert in different approaches (Deetz 1996).…”
Section: Conclusion: Approach Pluralismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a context, organizational factors are considered in relation with performance results, determining a continuing redesign of performance appraisal and management systems and processes where the organizational context is considered in a larger context (the industry, etc.) (Goodall et al, 1986, McKenna, Richardson, & Manroop, 2011.…”
Section: Recent Trends In Employee Performance Appraisal Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following privatization, the French MNC embarked on a process of human resource reform that encompassed (10) 0.226*** 20.072 2 0.126 Encouragement from immediate manager to exercise discretion at work (11) 0.168** 20.041 2 0.067 Appraisal of work (15) 0.273*** 20.135* 2 0.231*** Personal motivation (16) 0.272*** 20.087 2 0.157** Provision of training (19) 0.098 0.041 2 0.247*** Responsibility (23) 0.200*** 0.051 2 0.088 Pay (24) 0.193*** 0.067 2 0.202*** Sense of job security*** (28) 0.233*** 20.254*** 2 0.147* Your commitment to your employer and its objectives (29) 0.171** 0.039 2 0.184** Your team/department's commitment to your employer and its objectives (30) 0.156** 0.078 2 0.237*** The organization more strongly values employees' suggestions on work-related issues* (46) 0.094 20.014 2 0.188** There is now more emphasis on counselling rather than punishment to rectify mistakes in this organization** (47) 0.047 20.020 2 0.161** I share many values of my organization** (48) 0.100 20.022 2 0.170** People here are treated more fairly (51) 0.126* 20.064 2 0.214*** Note: Table shows Spearman's Rho, with the level of significance indicated by asterisks; *** better than 1 per cent; ** better than 5 per cent; * better than 10 per cent Table VI. Non-parametric correlations between independent and dependent variables PR 38,2 many aspects of modern Western policies and practices.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%