2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative Payment Models Should Risk-Adjust for Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to its retrospective nature confounding factors such as patient expectations were not investigated. McLawhorn et al and Qun et al found that patients who underwent cTHA required more transfusions, had longer operative times and length of hospital stays, and more often had non-home bound discharge [ 13 , 15 ]. Due to the absence of these data, no cost analysis could be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to its retrospective nature confounding factors such as patient expectations were not investigated. McLawhorn et al and Qun et al found that patients who underwent cTHA required more transfusions, had longer operative times and length of hospital stays, and more often had non-home bound discharge [ 13 , 15 ]. Due to the absence of these data, no cost analysis could be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts have been made to determine the success of cTHA among pTHA and rTHA, as this has implications for patient consenting and institutional reimbursement [ 10 17 ]. It has been suggested that a cTHA should be considered an rTHA, but also that it is a distinct entity with outcomes in between pTHA and rTHA [ 13 , 14 , 16 ]. Interpreting these studies is difficult, as matched cohort analyses are rare, follow-up differs between groups, but most importantly because of the fact that very diverse groups of cTHA’s are compared to very diverse groups of rTHA’s [ 10 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, risk adjustment has been inadequate for the sickest patients, leading to some hospitals incurring large losses to treat these patients and decreasing these patient's access to care. 10,[25][26][27] The results of our study indicates that MS-DRG reimbursement system results in under reimbursement for treating the least sick patients (MS-DRG weight < 2.5, average loss ¼ US$1566, n ¼ 215) and over reimbursement for treating the sickest patients (MS-DRG weight > 2.5, average profit ¼ US$1616, n ¼ 72) at our institution. The generalizability of this data is indeterminate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…5 However, studies reveal that these value-based bundled payments are often not appropriately adjusted for increased risk and procedural complexities; efforts to do so even with existing evidence are lacking. 6-8 As a result, surgeons are increasingly disincentivized to operate on high-risk patients, and patient access to needed surgery may become restricted. Our intention is to study the trend of practice and challenge the assumption that increased comorbidities may be associated with higher incidence of complications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%