2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10603-009-9111-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative Regulatory Cases Challenging Consumer Policy

Abstract: Consumer policy, Information and communication technologies, Consumer networks, Self-regulation, Postmodern politics,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For public services, collaborative consumption possesses particular disruptive potential, and as consumers increasingly use similar criteria to evaluate public services and private services (see Wensley & Moore, 2011;Fledderus et al, 2015), customers are becoming an integral part of the provision of services (Prahalad & Ramaswamy, 2004;Bardhi & Eckhardt, 2012;Hyysalo, Repo, Timonen, Hakkarainen, & Heiskanen, 2016), and consumerism challenges how public service offerings are decided on and regulated (Denhardt & Denhardt, 2015;Baldwin, Cave, & Lodge, 2012). The transformation of public service offerings is also facilitated by the emergence of disruptive technologies in information networks, smart technologies and automatization, which are also prompting institutional changes (Christensen et al, 2008;Repo, Timonen, & Zilliacus, 2009). Such disruption both throws into relief and complements the ideas of organizations which rely on routines (Vala, Pereira, & Caetano, 2017) or need to listen closely to their stakeholders (Alapo, 2018) and which might thus be overly conservative in situations where the respective field is experiencing radical change (Fliegstein, 2013;Repo, Hyvonen, Pantzar, & Timonen, 2006).…”
Section: Collaborative Consumption As a Source Of Disruptive Innovatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For public services, collaborative consumption possesses particular disruptive potential, and as consumers increasingly use similar criteria to evaluate public services and private services (see Wensley & Moore, 2011;Fledderus et al, 2015), customers are becoming an integral part of the provision of services (Prahalad & Ramaswamy, 2004;Bardhi & Eckhardt, 2012;Hyysalo, Repo, Timonen, Hakkarainen, & Heiskanen, 2016), and consumerism challenges how public service offerings are decided on and regulated (Denhardt & Denhardt, 2015;Baldwin, Cave, & Lodge, 2012). The transformation of public service offerings is also facilitated by the emergence of disruptive technologies in information networks, smart technologies and automatization, which are also prompting institutional changes (Christensen et al, 2008;Repo, Timonen, & Zilliacus, 2009). Such disruption both throws into relief and complements the ideas of organizations which rely on routines (Vala, Pereira, & Caetano, 2017) or need to listen closely to their stakeholders (Alapo, 2018) and which might thus be overly conservative in situations where the respective field is experiencing radical change (Fliegstein, 2013;Repo, Hyvonen, Pantzar, & Timonen, 2006).…”
Section: Collaborative Consumption As a Source Of Disruptive Innovatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, public (consumer) policy supports empowerment to overcome power imbalances in the conduct of consumers. Repo et al . (2009), for example, note that consumer empowerment in the digital age must face several challenges and requires new forms of regulation.…”
Section: Consumer Power and Empowerment In Public Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, public (consumer) policy supports empowerment to overcome power imbalances in the conduct of consumers. Repo et al (2009), for example, note that consumer empowerment in the digital age must face several challenges and requires new forms of regulation. Thøgersen (2005) highlights the consumer need of empowerment for more sustainable consumption: as victim, consumers should be safeguarded and, moreover, should be activated to ease a transformation towards a condition in which the responsible market actor faces no severe challenges.…”
Section: Consumer Power and Empowerment In Public Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, selecting the Single Market perspective as a starting point bypasses national economic and institutional arrangements which, nevertheless, need to be addressed. The domain of consumer policy, however, tends to overcome this dichotomy and could be particularly successful in doing so, as evidenced by regular calls for policy renewal (Hondius 2012;Reisch 2004;Repo et al 2009Repo et al , 2013.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%