2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(99)00137-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative solution methods for crack problems in plane anisotropic elasticity, with examples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the Airy stress function can be expressed in terms of two arbitrary analytical functions F 1 (z 1 ) and F 2 (z 2 ) as = 2ℜ [F 1 (z 1 ) + F 2 (z 2 )] , ( = 1, 2), (9) in which ℜ determines the real parts of complex numbers. In this case, the Airy stress function can be expressed in terms of two arbitrary analytical functions F 1 (z 1 ) and F 2 (z 2 ) as = 2ℜ [F 1 (z 1 ) + F 2 (z 2 )] , ( = 1, 2), (9) in which ℜ determines the real parts of complex numbers.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the Airy stress function can be expressed in terms of two arbitrary analytical functions F 1 (z 1 ) and F 2 (z 2 ) as = 2ℜ [F 1 (z 1 ) + F 2 (z 2 )] , ( = 1, 2), (9) in which ℜ determines the real parts of complex numbers. In this case, the Airy stress function can be expressed in terms of two arbitrary analytical functions F 1 (z 1 ) and F 2 (z 2 ) as = 2ℜ [F 1 (z 1 ) + F 2 (z 2 )] , ( = 1, 2), (9) in which ℜ determines the real parts of complex numbers.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristic equation normally has distinct complex roots ( 1 ≠ 2 ) in anisotropic problems. In this case, the Airy stress function can be expressed in terms of two arbitrary analytical functions F 1 (z 1 ) and F 2 (z 2 ) as = 2ℜ [F 1 (z 1 ) + F 2 (z 2 )] , ( = 1, 2), (9) in which ℜ determines the real parts of complex numbers. To further simplify the formulations, two new complex potentials Φ 1 (z 1 ) = dF 1 ∕dz 1 and Φ 2 (z 2 ) = dF 2 ∕dz 2 may be used along with Equations (9) and (3) to determine the in-plane stress field as in (10).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Fisher-Crisps [21] has shown that the elastic modulus of functionally graded material derived from current conventional methods has a discrepancy with the actual value, using such a functionally graded elastic modulus will most certainly extend the computational time but will not necessarily improve accuracy. Although anisotropy introduces additional material properties that render the basic field equation better structured, more accurate and easier to solve, as suggested by Azhdari et al [22], many simplified FE models assume isotropic conditions. A good example is a recent study by Dong and Darvell [12], who represented a ceramic-cement substrate under indentation by an FE model with isotropy and obtained reasonable agreement in calculated and observed values of the contact radius.…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case the equilibrium states of the material can be represented by two complex potentials defined in two complex planes [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. We shall use Guz's representation of the elastic state [1], without initial deformation, in a weakly modified form due to Soos [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%