2015
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.1461oia35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative splicing converts STIM2 from an activator to an inhibitor of store-operated calcium channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
37
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
37
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting protein STIM2.1 by itself is indeed unable to tightly bind and to activate Orai channels. While STIM2.1 shows a reduced expression compared with STIM2.2, we found relevant expression (nearly equal to STIM2.2) in naïve CD4 ϩ and CD8 ϩ T cells with significant downregulation of expression upon differentiation into effector cells (53), whereas Rana et al (63) found upregulation of the STIM2␤ (2.1) over STIM2␣ (2.2) upon early myogenic differentiation of murine C2C12 myoblasts. In naïve T cells, silencing of STIM2.1, but not of STIM2.2, caused an increase in SOCE, indicating a dominant-negative function of STIM2.1 in vivo.…”
Section: Alternative Splicingcontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…The resulting protein STIM2.1 by itself is indeed unable to tightly bind and to activate Orai channels. While STIM2.1 shows a reduced expression compared with STIM2.2, we found relevant expression (nearly equal to STIM2.2) in naïve CD4 ϩ and CD8 ϩ T cells with significant downregulation of expression upon differentiation into effector cells (53), whereas Rana et al (63) found upregulation of the STIM2␤ (2.1) over STIM2␣ (2.2) upon early myogenic differentiation of murine C2C12 myoblasts. In naïve T cells, silencing of STIM2.1, but not of STIM2.2, caused an increase in SOCE, indicating a dominant-negative function of STIM2.1 in vivo.…”
Section: Alternative Splicingcontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…; Rana et al . ). On the other hand, bioinformatic tools predict the existence of four additional protein‐coding STIM2 mRNA isoforms in human (http://www.ensembl.org/).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Rana et al . ), the interaction of STIM1 with TRPC Ca 2+ channels (Lee et al . ), as well as the communication with calmodulin (CaM) (Miederer et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question we set out to explore was if all of these highly diverse functions of STIM1 are indeed mediated by exactly the same protein, or if and how alternative splicing modifies STIM1 structure and function to adapt to cell-type specific requirements. In the past, we and others have identified a splice variant of STIM2 (STIM2.1; STIM2ß), which prevents interaction and gating of Orai channels 16,17 thus acts as a strong dominant-negative regulator of SOCE by altering the density of activated Orai complexes 18 and has recently been shown to regulate myogenesis by controlling SOCE dependent transcriptional factors 19 . Given the existence of this inhibitory splice variant, the often small effects seen upon genetic deletion of STIM2 may indeed underestimate a STIM2 mediated effect, if the concomitant deletion of expressed STIM2.1 deletes the negative regulator STIM2.1/STIM2ß.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%