2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative splicing in the fiddler crab cognate ecdysteroid receptor: Variation in receptor isoform expression and DNA binding properties in response to hormone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(133 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SpEcR isoforms of S. paramamosain were differentiated by one deletion site in the D domain and one substitution site in the LBD, which is similar to what has been reported for other crustaceans (Asazuma et al 2007, Techa & Chung 2013. In fact, the results of recent research on the genomic organization of the EcR gene in the fiddler crab U. pugilator (Up gDNA) further verified the existence of the D domain and LBD isoforms (Durica et al 2014). Interestingly, the LBD substitutive sequences of SpEcR from S. paramamosain were almost the same as the two alternative LBD exons of Up gDNA, and the D domain deletion sequence of SpEcR was also similar to its D domain alternative exon.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The SpEcR isoforms of S. paramamosain were differentiated by one deletion site in the D domain and one substitution site in the LBD, which is similar to what has been reported for other crustaceans (Asazuma et al 2007, Techa & Chung 2013. In fact, the results of recent research on the genomic organization of the EcR gene in the fiddler crab U. pugilator (Up gDNA) further verified the existence of the D domain and LBD isoforms (Durica et al 2014). Interestingly, the LBD substitutive sequences of SpEcR from S. paramamosain were almost the same as the two alternative LBD exons of Up gDNA, and the D domain deletion sequence of SpEcR was also similar to its D domain alternative exon.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The concurrent upregulation of SpEcR transcripts in the ovary with ovarian development implied that they probably participated in the regulation of the process of yolk protein accumulation. However, there are also reports indicating that the expression level of EcR does not differ significantly during ovarian development in other crabs (Durica et al 2014, Techa et al 2014. These results may be caused by the possible species-specific mechanisms of regulation of EcR during ovarian development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over half of the 13 sequences had greater than 99% identity in protein alignment. The small discrepancy of 1% to 3% between the nucleotide and protein sequences was attributed to differences between the two technologies, the tissue sources used, novel isoforms, and sequencing errors (Durica et al, 2014). These comparisons confirmed the accuracy of the sequence generation and assembly protocols, validating the use of this data for further analysis.…”
Section: Assembly and Analysis Of The Baseline Transcriptomementioning
confidence: 59%
“…Transcriptomics using NGS technology has revealed genes involved in stress response, reproduction, development, molting and growth, limb regeneration, immune response, endocrinology, and nutrition and digestion in decapod crustaceans (Sagi et al 2013; Tom et al 2013; Durica et al 2014; Ghaffari et al 2014; Hao et al 2014; Lv et al, 2014, 2015; Shen et al 2014; Song et al 2014; Tom et al 2014; Wei et al 2014a, 2014b; Abehsera et al 2015; Chandler et al 2015; Christiaens et al 2015; Huang et al 2015; Johnson et al 2015; Li et al 2015a, 2015b; Ventura et al 2014, 2015; Verbruggen et al 2015; Wang et al 2015; Das et al 2016a). It is clear from the input received at the SICB meeting and the ten symposium papers in this issue (Armstrong and Stillman 2016; Chandler et al 2016; Clark and Greenwood 2016; Das and Mykles 2016; Das et al 2016b; Havird and Santos 2016a, 2016b; Johnson et al 2016; Powell et al 2016; Tarrant et al 2016) that a greater understanding of the relationship between transcriptomic and phenotypic change in decapod crustaceans will not be achieved until more powerful and applicable “-omic” tools and resources are developed.…”
Section: Future Directions and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%