Bulletin of Applied Economics 2021
DOI: 10.47260/bae/811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative to Insurance Risk Transfer: Creating a catastrophe bond for Romanian earthquakes

Abstract: As the severity of natural catastrophes continues to intensify, in terms of the economic, environmental and human impacts, disaster risk management is becoming increasingly significant. The limitations of the insurance and reinsurance market capacity led to the development of alternative risk transfer products. These products are designed to alleviate the risk, in whole or partly, by putting into effect securitisation mechanisms that increase liquidity. Among them, catastrophe risk bonds are designed to transf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The payoff function depends on the trigger condition that occurs. In previous studies, the payoff function on Cat Bond was modelled in the form of a binary linear function [12,18,20,23,25,33,42] and piecewise linear function [20,23,33,48]. In the proposed model, the payoff function model uses piecewise linear because it can better describe the damage conditions caused by the earthquake.…”
Section: Decb Payoff Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The payoff function depends on the trigger condition that occurs. In previous studies, the payoff function on Cat Bond was modelled in the form of a binary linear function [12,18,20,23,25,33,42] and piecewise linear function [20,23,33,48]. In the proposed model, the payoff function model uses piecewise linear because it can better describe the damage conditions caused by the earthquake.…”
Section: Decb Payoff Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods used are CIR to model coupons; The Maxima block is used to select the maximum annual earthquake magnitude; GEV is used to model the distribution of the magnitude of the annual earthquake disaster. Kiohos and Paspati [20] used a model similar to Zimbidis et al, [48]. However, the territory used in Romania.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This high loss burdens the budgets of earthquakeprone countries (countries whose territories lie atop tectonic plate lines) [4][5][6][7], so several of them used traditional insurance mechanisms to obtain contingency funds for mitigation from 1992 to 2000. However, this mechanism generally has shortcomings, whereby the provided contingency costs pale in comparison to the actual losses incurred [8][9][10]. For example, earthquake insurance in Turkey in 1992 and Japan in 1993 provided contingency costs of USD 10.8 million (1.44% of actual losses) [11] and USD 16 million (1.6% of actual losses) [12], respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, between 1992 and 2000, many countries used traditional insurance mechanisms to obtain contingency costs for their earthquake responses. However, traditional earthquake insurance mechanisms are generally ineffective because the contingency costs are less significant than the actual losses [8,9]. For example, in 1992, Turkey used earthquake insurance to cope with an earthquake in Erzincan with a magnitude of 6.8 Mw [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%