2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0061369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternatives to aluminum gates for silicon quantum devices: Defects and strain

Abstract: Gate-defined quantum dots benefit from the use of small grain size metals for gate materials because they aid in shrinking the device dimensions. However, it is not clear what differences arise with respect to process-induced defect densities and inhomogeneous strain. Here, we present measurements of fixed charge, Qf; interface trap density, Dit; the intrinsic film stress, σ; and the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, as a function of forming gas anneal temperature for Al, Ti/Pd, and Ti/Pt gates. We show tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, potential fluctuations are naturally present, as illustrated in Figure c. They can be caused by defects, charge traps and mechanical stress induced by the deposition of metallic gates, , as well as variations in material growth or in the exact shape of the gates. The development of devices based on quantum wells buried in heterostructures, similar to that sketched in Figure a, already has led to a drastic improvement of the uniformity compared to metal oxide semiconductor systems .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, potential fluctuations are naturally present, as illustrated in Figure c. They can be caused by defects, charge traps and mechanical stress induced by the deposition of metallic gates, , as well as variations in material growth or in the exact shape of the gates. The development of devices based on quantum wells buried in heterostructures, similar to that sketched in Figure a, already has led to a drastic improvement of the uniformity compared to metal oxide semiconductor systems .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These traps could be bound states in the nonoxidized part of the silicon capping layer or at its SiGe interface. They can be induced by charge defects in the gate oxide or emerge due to mechanical stress originating from the deposition of metallic gates. , Also, charge trapping into and out of unpassivated silicon and germanium dangling bonds, charge trapping in the oxide itself mediated by leakage currents, , or movement of mobile ions might be underlying the hysteresis. In all cases, when the gate voltage stress is removed, the charges would be expected to be immobile at the device operation temperature and would cause local shifts in the intrinsic potential landscape observable as alterations in the pinch-off characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substantial reductions in variability have been achieved through progress in heterostructure growth and device fabrication. For instance, these efforts focus on reducing material disorder, advancing device fabrication, and addressing fluctuations in mechanical stress induced by the deposition of metallic gate electrodes. However, significant variations remain observable in current devices, ,, and it is an open question whether sufficient uniformity can be reached through material development alone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%