2022
DOI: 10.17061/phrp31122106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternatives to low birthweight as a population-level indicator of infant and child health

Abstract: Low birthweight is commonly used as a population-level indicator of infant health, however it conflates preterm birth and intrauterine growth restriction which require different approaches to prevention. This study finds that low birthweight as a single indicator masks opposing trends in these two conditions • Infants born preterm or small for gestational age have poorer health and educational outcomes than those born well-grown at term • Reporting preterm birth and an indicator of growth restriction at term w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used birth weight as a surrogate for preterm birth because low birth weight is a result of preterm birth or intrauterine growth restriction 37 and our data on gestational age were incomplete. 38 These early-life factors might have influenced choice of soy formula feeding and have been associated with fibroid prevalence, though the studies are few, and data are limited. Maternal fibroid history was assessed as a potential confounder, but it did not affect observed associations between soy formula feeding and fibroid development, so it was not included in final models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used birth weight as a surrogate for preterm birth because low birth weight is a result of preterm birth or intrauterine growth restriction 37 and our data on gestational age were incomplete. 38 These early-life factors might have influenced choice of soy formula feeding and have been associated with fibroid prevalence, though the studies are few, and data are limited. Maternal fibroid history was assessed as a potential confounder, but it did not affect observed associations between soy formula feeding and fibroid development, so it was not included in final models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%