2005
DOI: 10.1094/apsnetfeature/2005-0605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternatives to Methyl Bromide: A Florida Perspective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethanedinitrile (C 2 N 2 ; EDN) was initially studied for its efficacy to control insects, fungi, nematodes and rodents in stored grains and timber and wood packaging materials . Preliminary research revealed that EDN used as a soil fumigant exhibited efficacy against soil‐borne fungi, plant‐parasitic nematodes and weeds . Compared with MB (boiling point 3.5 °C; vapor pressure 1.42 × 10 3 mmHg at 20 °C), EDN (boiling point −21 °C; vapor pressure 3.9 × 10 3 mmHg at 21 °C) has a lower boiling point but higher vapor pressure .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethanedinitrile (C 2 N 2 ; EDN) was initially studied for its efficacy to control insects, fungi, nematodes and rodents in stored grains and timber and wood packaging materials . Preliminary research revealed that EDN used as a soil fumigant exhibited efficacy against soil‐borne fungi, plant‐parasitic nematodes and weeds . Compared with MB (boiling point 3.5 °C; vapor pressure 1.42 × 10 3 mmHg at 20 °C), EDN (boiling point −21 °C; vapor pressure 3.9 × 10 3 mmHg at 21 °C) has a lower boiling point but higher vapor pressure .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] Through critical use exemptions (CUE), however, MBr still can be used in agriculture for soil fumigation and postharvest uses. [3,4] Exemptions were granted only when certain criteria were met that included a criterion: "the applicant had taken all feasible steps to minimize their use of MBr and the associated emissions." [3] For 2005, the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) authorized 35% of the U.S. 1991 baseline for CUE or 9,445 metric tonnes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3,4] Exemptions were granted only when certain criteria were met that included a criterion: "the applicant had taken all feasible steps to minimize their use of MBr and the associated emissions." [3] For 2005, the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) authorized 35% of the U.S. 1991 baseline for CUE or 9,445 metric tonnes. [3,5] UNEP authorized 32% or 8,075 metric tonnes and 29% or 7,318 metric tonnes for the U.S. baseline for 2006 and 2007 CUE, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This nematode reduces yield both directly by the second-stage juveniles (J2) infecting and siphoning off nutrients from infected plants and indirectly by creating wound sites that facilitate secondary fungal infection (Liu, et al, 1997;Wrather et al, 1997). Chemical nematicides as part of conventional management approaches are the most efficient in controlling this pest, but many of these fumigants and chemical compounds have been banned because of their toxic effects on the environment and human health (Rosskopf et al, 2005). Alternatives that are more environmentally friendly include the use of natural antagonists for the suppression of SCN (Zhang et al, 2008a(Zhang et al, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%