2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3644819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternatives to Paying Child Benefit to the Rich: Means Testing or Higher Tax?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proponents make an intuitive argument for residualist vs universalist programs. 6 They say means testing reduces government spending by targeting benefits to fewer people, which lessens the need for taxation to finance the program. The argument goes on that less taxation is good because greater taxation reduces taxpayers' incentive to work.…”
Section: A Means Test Is a Taxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proponents make an intuitive argument for residualist vs universalist programs. 6 They say means testing reduces government spending by targeting benefits to fewer people, which lessens the need for taxation to finance the program. The argument goes on that less taxation is good because greater taxation reduces taxpayers' incentive to work.…”
Section: A Means Test Is a Taxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of raising $240 billion through income taxation, the government raised $165 billion through income taxation and clawed back the other $75 billion with a means test. 6 With income taxation, as factor income rises, disposable income does not rise in step because tax liabilities increase. With means testing, as factor income rises, disposable income does not rise in step because transfer payments decrease.…”
Section: A Means Test Is a Taxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this subsection, we analyze the excess burden of potentially excessive subsidies. This line of analysis follows Apps et al (2020) stress that a complete look at redistributive policies requires an explicit analysis of the loss of welfare related to distortions created by this policy. In their case, they show that the use of a targeted tax on the rich for financing universal child allowances is a better mechanism than means-tested allowances.…”
Section: Self-selection Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on active labor market welfare programs has empirically documented long-run effects in the education field. See Bastian and Michelmore (2018) to learn about the impact of the EITC on education achievements. Hoynes and Rothstein (2019) explain that the Basic Income program also has potentially important long-run effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%