1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0193-953x(18)30677-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternatives to Psychiatric Hospitalization for Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence of the effectiveness of inpatient treatment cannot be a reason for increasing psychiatric hospitalization. There are still no definitive studies that show hospitalization to be superior to outpatient interventions for most children and adolescents with mental health troubles (Braun et al, 1981;Kiesler, 1982;Goldfine et al, 1985;U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, 1986;Dalton, Miller, & Forman, 1989).…”
Section: Psychiatric Hospitalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence of the effectiveness of inpatient treatment cannot be a reason for increasing psychiatric hospitalization. There are still no definitive studies that show hospitalization to be superior to outpatient interventions for most children and adolescents with mental health troubles (Braun et al, 1981;Kiesler, 1982;Goldfine et al, 1985;U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, 1986;Dalton, Miller, & Forman, 1989).…”
Section: Psychiatric Hospitalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there exists little support for either point. The hospital treatment of suicidal adolescents has yet to be scrutinized by comparison to any control groups treated on an outpatient basis (Goldfine, Heath, Hardesty, Berman, Gosdon and Lind, 1985). The data that have emerged from outcome studies of children and adolescents treated in psychiatric hospitals for suicidal thoughts or actions is discouraging.…”
Section: Introduction Zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbazyxwvutsrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cole and Poe (1993) stated that 87% of all cross-agency dollars available to treat children with SED are used for institutional care, and only 2% of this specific population are treated with these funds. Despite the growing concern surrounding the over-use of restrictive out-of-home placements (Goldfine, Heath, Hardesty, Berman, & Lind, 1985;Kiesler, 1993;Knitzer, 1982;Lundy & Pumariega, 1993;Sondheimer, Schoenwald, & Rowland, 1994), the practice continues for a variety of systemic reasons (Frank & Dewa, 1992;Kiesler, 1982Kiesler, , 1993Weithorn, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%