2019
DOI: 10.1101/690396
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altitude and life-history shape the evolution ofHeliconiuswings

Abstract: Phenotypic divergence between closely related species has long interested biologists. Taxa that inhabit a range of environments and have diverse natural histories can help understand how selection drives phenotypic divergence. In butterflies, wing color patterns have been extensively studied but diversity in wing shape and size is less well understood. Here, we assess the relative importance of phylogenetic relatedness, natural history, and habitat on shaping wing morphology in a large dataset of over 3500 ind… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Every Heliconius species encountered at each site was collected, but only those species with more than 5 individuals at each elevation (high and/or low) were included in the analyses (15 out of 329 wild individuals removed). Detached wings were photographed dorsally and ventrally with a DSLR camera with a 100 mm macro lens in standardised conditions, and wing area was measured with an automated pipeline in the public software Fiji (following Montejo-Kovacevich et al, 2019). Butterflies with Heliconius melpomene malleti phenotypes were genotyped with a restriction digest of amplified COI genes (following Nadeau et al, 2014), to identify cryptic H. timareta spp.…”
Section: Study System An D Wild Butterfly Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Every Heliconius species encountered at each site was collected, but only those species with more than 5 individuals at each elevation (high and/or low) were included in the analyses (15 out of 329 wild individuals removed). Detached wings were photographed dorsally and ventrally with a DSLR camera with a 100 mm macro lens in standardised conditions, and wing area was measured with an automated pipeline in the public software Fiji (following Montejo-Kovacevich et al, 2019). Butterflies with Heliconius melpomene malleti phenotypes were genotyped with a restriction digest of amplified COI genes (following Nadeau et al, 2014), to identify cryptic H. timareta spp.…”
Section: Study System An D Wild Butterfly Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Offspring from high and low altitude mothers had individual IDs with no indication of their origin, thus we were able to blindly test five individuals at a time and avoid potential observer bias. Adult offspring wings were photographed and their wing areas measured with an automated pipeline in the open-access software Fiji (following Montejo-Kovacevich et al, 2019).…”
Section: Common-g Arden Re Aringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Butterfly wing size varies according to the quality and quantity of the food source provided by larval host plants (Rodrigues & Moreira, ). It also varies according to the behavioral ecology of larvae and adults, as for example in lonely larvae, adults of the adult‐mating clade and of higher altitudes, that have larger wings (Montejo‐Kovacevich et al, ). In Heliconius butterflies, Müller () showed through illustrations and text that the androconial scales of Heliconius apseudes (Hübner, [1813]), Heliconius eucrate (Godart, 1819) and Heliconius besckei Ménétriés, 1857, among other Nymphalidae, are quite variable on the upper surface of the hindwing, near the costal margin and particularly along the costal and subcostal veins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every Heliconius species encountered at each site was collected, but only those species with more than 5 individuals at each elevation (high and/or low) were included in the analyses (15 out of 329 wild individuals removed). Detached wings were photographed dorsally and ventrally with a DSLR camera with a 100 mm macro lens in standardised conditions, and wing area was measured with an automated pipeline in the public software Fiji (following Montejo-Kovacevich et al, 2019). All the images are available in the public repository Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/communities/butterfly/) and full records with data are stored in the EarthCape database (https://heliconius.ecdb.io).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%