2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2709606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altruism in the (social) network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results are found for college students by Mobius et al. (2004) and Brañas‐Garza et al. (2006).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similar results are found for college students by Mobius et al. (2004) and Brañas‐Garza et al. (2006).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…6 Thus, the design of the experiment seeks to avoid the existence of risk dominant equilibria. 7 ii) Strategic uncertainty. We reduce this e¤ect by making that the maximum and minimum payo¤s players can obtain with each strategy do not di¤er in more than 1 experimental unit so, the problem of players choosing a particular strategy because they assure higher expected payo¤s practically disappears.…”
Section: Second Stage: Coordination Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 See for example Schmidt, Shupp, Walker and Ostrom (2003). 7 As a consequence, the only Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies for both games is , that is playing each strategy at random with equal probability, independently of the role of the player.…”
Section: Second Stage: Coordination Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Leider et al (2009) we conduct other experiments with the same subject pool to distinguish directed altruism between socially close subjects from norms of reciprocity that are supported by the repeated super-game played between subjects in the social network. In subsequent research, Goeree et al (2008) use our design to measure directed altruism in a school network of teenage girls (also see Brañas-Garza et al (2006) for experimental data with European university students). Although these studies confirm our findings of directed altruism, they do not measure beliefs about expected generosity of others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%