“…Using the evidence for only a limited amount of global contraction (Δ R p ≤5 km) after the end of the late heavy bombardment as principal constraint and a minimal requirement on the production of secondary crust (at least 5 km), we extracted a small subset of admissible solutions whose characteristics enables us to draw the following conclusions that are robust within the assumptions of our models: - Using a mantle thickness of 400 km, corresponding to the most likely value predicted by Hauck et al [], about 1% of the models tested is compatible with the imposed constraints. A larger thickness of 500 km, corresponding to the upper limit provided by Hauck et al [], delivers similar results, while a thickness of 300 km, corresponding to the lower end of the spectrum of possible interior structure configurations, seems unlikely since no admissible combination of parameters is found that satisfies the contractional and crustal production constraints simultaneously;
- Assuming the surface concentration of radiogenic elements measured via Gamma‐ray spectroscopy [ Peplowski et al , ] to be representative for the entire crust, we determined enrichment factors between 2.5 and 4.5, which, with 35–62 ppb Th, 20–36 ppb U, and 290–515 ppm K, hint at a bulk heat source content similar to that of the other terrestrial planets;
- Even though combinations of parameters for which present‐day crustal thicknesses as large as 80 km are possible, the vast majority of admissible solutions predicts the existence of a thin crust of ∼20 km or less;
- While it is common to find models characterized by a prolonged phase of volcanic activity as required by the observations [e.g., Head et al , ], models showing present‐day mantle convection are rare. Convective heat transport generally tends to cease after 3–4 Gyr, suggesting that Mercury may no longer be dynamically active;
- The 2‐D and 3‐D simulations confirm the general trends observed in the parametrized 1‐D models in terms of Mercury's thermal history and crustal production.
…”