2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11669-012-0007-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aluminum Impurity Diffusion in Magnesium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
9
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the SIMS dynamic range for accurate tracer concentration beyond the background concentration spans at most one or two orders of magnitude, which can be insufficient for a reliable fit on a log versus x 2 plot. Additionally, it is necessary to know the background tracer concentration, c b,i , to use Eq 10, unless the tracer is an impurity, in which case Eq 12 can be used (e.g., Al impurity diffusion in Mg [42] ). The background tracer concentration is usually determined by measuring the tracer concentration deep in the bulk of the sample near the asymptotic limit of the depth profile, where instrument noise becomes more significant.…”
Section: Thin-film Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the SIMS dynamic range for accurate tracer concentration beyond the background concentration spans at most one or two orders of magnitude, which can be insufficient for a reliable fit on a log versus x 2 plot. Additionally, it is necessary to know the background tracer concentration, c b,i , to use Eq 10, unless the tracer is an impurity, in which case Eq 12 can be used (e.g., Al impurity diffusion in Mg [42] ). The background tracer concentration is usually determined by measuring the tracer concentration deep in the bulk of the sample near the asymptotic limit of the depth profile, where instrument noise becomes more significant.…”
Section: Thin-film Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the available tracer diffusion data in the Mg alloy system is selfdiffusion data, i.e., diffusion of Mg in pure Mg, and includes both single and polycrystalline data. There are considerable data on impurity diffusion of various elements in pure Mg [39] that have been obtained using both the radiotracer [40,41] and SIMS techniques, [42] as well as firstprinciples methods. [43] The available Mg self-diffusion data have been obtained using the radiotracer technique, which has provided Mg tracer diffusion data at high temperatures (>450-650°C) in polycrystals [44] and single crystals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anisotropy of the Al diffusivity became smaller with increasing temperature. While Brennan et al 13 experimentally determined the activation energy and pre-exponential factor of Al impurity diffusion in Mg at a temperature range of 573 K-673 K, they calculated the diffusion coefficient which included contribution from grain boundary diffusion and sputter roughening. Minamino et al 14 investigated an inter-diffusion in the Al-4.06at% Mg alloy under high pressure in a temperature range of 690 -877 K. The diffusion coefficients decreased with pressure, and the activation volume of the inter-diffusion was between 0.81V 0 and 0.87V 0 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The revised Al impurity diffusion coefficients, depending on the orientation of hcp Mg, were plotted in Figure 7(b) and compared with previous studies. [4,7,9] The revised optimized mobilities of Al in hcp Mg along the a-and c-axis of Mg crystal are [5] The present activation energies of the diffusion of Al in hcp Mg along the a-and c-axis are 154.48 ± 3.86 kJ/ mol and 159.48 ± 2.45 kJ/mol, respectively. [5,8] Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7-Variation of Al impurity diffusion coefficients in hcp Mg along its a-and c-axis directions with temperature. (a) Present results from single crystal diffusion experiment (model and analytical represent the calculations by multiphase diffusion simulation and analytical method, respectively), and (b) comparison with the previous data derived from polycrystalline samples [4,7] and the first principles calculations. [9] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%