Alveolar distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay bone graft for vertical augmentation of severely atrophied alveolar ridges after 12 years of long-term follow-up

Kim, Jin-Woo; Cho, Min-hee; Kim, Sun‐Jong; Kim, Myung-Rae

doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.037

Cited by 58 publications

(85 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The high long‐term survival rate of dental implants situated in OBGs presented in this retrospective study indicates the safety and efficacy of this method for restoration of severely atrophic alveolar ridges. This survival rate (93.4%) was similar to the long‐term survival rate reported previously for dental implants situated in OBGs, thus giving further support to the effectiveness and predictability of utilizing bone grafts of intraoral origin to support dental implantation. The healing process after autologous bone transplantation is well researched and takes place in several distinct steps.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Long Term Follow‐Up of Dental Implants Placed in Autologous Onlay Bone Graft

Schwartz‐Arad¹,

Ofec

Eliyahu³

et al. 2014

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Long Term Follow‐Up of Dental Implants Placed in Autologous Onlay Bone Graft

Schwartz‐Arad¹,

Ofec

Eliyahu³

et al. 2014

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, 12 studies cited implant survival as their main outcome, while five studies stated that they intended to use some predefined criteria for success assessment (eg, Albrektsson et al, Buser et al), although this goal was not necessarily achieved. Of those studies reporting a success rate, one study reported a survival rate and patients' subjective sensation, one study reported a survival rate, clinical parameters and patients' subjective sensation, and one study reported a survival rate and clinical parameters . Only two studies reported the full extent (ie, on the additional three parameters in the success criteria by Albrektsson and colleagues) of the aspects .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One study reported on survival and patient subjective sensation . Two studies reported on survival, radiographic parameters, and clinical parameters, while one study reported on survival, radiographic parameters, and patients' subjective sensation . Two studies evaluated all these aspects simultaneously .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Long term follow‐up of titanium implants installed in block‐grafted areas: A systematic review

Fuglsig

Thorn

Ingerslev

et al. 2018

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background An enduring clinical question concerns the outcome (ie, success) of implants placed in areas grafted with block‐grafts. Objective To undertake a systematic review of the literature on the long term results (≥5 years) of implants placed in maxillofacial areas grafted with any type of osseous block‐grafts in two‐stage surgeries. Further, the review addresses how available success criteria were used within the studies. Materials and Methods The MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE bibliographic databases were searched up to March 2017 for studies evaluating the long term results of implants placed in grafted areas. The search strategy was restricted to English language publications using combined terms which referred to the treatment method (implants placed in areas grafted with bone blocks), and follow‐up characteristics (≥5 years and assessment of at least one parameter related to implant success criteria). To qualify for inclusion, studies should present outcome measurements indicating the success (or at least the survival) of the implants. Results The search strategy yielded 17 studies, which were included in this systematic review. These studies presented survival rates ranging from 88.7% (after 15 years follow‐up) to 98.7% (after 5 years follow‐up). Five studies presented data based on predefined success criteria with success rates ranging from 86.8% to 100%. In these studies, the term “success” was often not properly defined. Conclusion The long term survival (≥5 years) of implants placed into block‐grafted areas in two‐stage surgeries was not lower than 75%, while success rates ranged from 86.8% to 100%. Although it was possible to identify published success criteria for implant follow‐up, there is no broad consensus on how to report implant success in a consistent manner.

show abstract

“…16 As vertical augmentation and subsequent vertical resorption can be unpredictable, most authors prefer the 2-stage procedure and implants are placed after the bone grafts have consolidated. [17][18][19] Cardaropoli et al reported simultaneous placement of implants and vertical augmentation of the ridge. 20 The mean (SD) vertical gain was 4.0 (1.5) mm, but they did not report resorption of the graft.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%