Alveolar ridge preservation of damaged or periodontally compromised extraction sockets with bovine‐ and porcine‐derived block bone substitutes: A retrospective case–control study

Abstract

PurposeAlveolar ridge preservation (ARP) was introduced to minimize postextraction alveolar bone loss and extraction socket remodeling; however, current knowledge of the ARP procedure for nonintact extraction sockets is still limited and inconclusive. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the difference between using deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen (DBBM‐C) and deproteinized porcine bone mineral with 10% collagen (DPBM‐C) when performing ARP procedures in damaged or periodontally compromised extraction sockets based on clinical, radiographic, and profilometric outcomes.MethodsIn total, 108 extraction sockets were grafted with 67 DBBM‐C and 41 DPBM‐C. Changes in radiographic (horizontal width and vertical height) and profilometric outcomes were measured after the ARP procedure and before the implant surgery. Postoperative discomfort (including the severity and duration of pain and swelling), early wound healing outcomes (including spontaneous bleeding and persistent swelling), implant stability, and treatment modalities for implant placement were also assessed.ResultsRadiographically, the DBBM‐C group decreased by −1.70 ± 2.26 mm (−21.50%) and − 1.39 ± 1.85 mm (−30.47%) horizontally and vertically, and the corresponding DPBM‐C group decreased by −1.66 ± 1.80 mm (−20.82%) and −1.44 ± 1.97 mm (−27.89%) horizontally and vertically at an average of 5.6 months. There were no serious or adverse complications in any of the cases, and none of the measured parameters differed significantly between the groups.ConclusionWithin the limitations of this study, ARP with DBBM‐C and DPBM‐C showed similar clinical, radiographic, and profilometric outcomes in nonintact extraction sockets.