2002
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.59.7.1022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alzheimer’s disease can be accurately diagnosed in very mildly impaired individuals

Abstract: When comprehensive assessment procedures are employed, AD can be diagnosed with reasonably high accuracy in very mildly impaired individuals. However, the dementia evaluation should be repeated after approximately 1 year to ensure the accuracy of the initial diagnosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
106
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
8
106
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences among PD subgroups for the MDRS were not significant, although all 3 subgroups performed significantly worse than a group of demographically matched healthy individuals (M = 137.3, SD = 4.2). According to published criteria using the MDRS in classifying dementia using a highly educated Alzheimer disease cohort (cutoff <133; sensitivity = 0.96; specificity = 0.92), 34 Isella et al's 8 subgroup means (ie, 130.4, 130.8, and 127.3) were below this cutoff. In the current study, we used a more stringent exclusionary criterion for classification of dementia; with mean total MDRS subgroup scores considerably higher than the Isella et al's cutoff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences among PD subgroups for the MDRS were not significant, although all 3 subgroups performed significantly worse than a group of demographically matched healthy individuals (M = 137.3, SD = 4.2). According to published criteria using the MDRS in classifying dementia using a highly educated Alzheimer disease cohort (cutoff <133; sensitivity = 0.96; specificity = 0.92), 34 Isella et al's 8 subgroup means (ie, 130.4, 130.8, and 127.3) were below this cutoff. In the current study, we used a more stringent exclusionary criterion for classification of dementia; with mean total MDRS subgroup scores considerably higher than the Isella et al's cutoff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laterality of motor symptoms was not considered in light of previous work that revealed nonsignificant differences between PD patients with either left-sided or right-sided motor symptoms on numerous measures of cognitive functioning. 32 Participants were excluded from the study if they (a) displayed impaired global intellectual functioning [total score on the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS)] 33 ; cutoff <133), 34 (b) had undergone a surgical procedure for the treatment of PD, (c) had a history of any other neurologic disorder and/or acquired brain injury, (d) presented with Parkinson-plus symptomatology (eg, myoclonus, apraxia, oculomotor abnormalities, ataxia, and/or sensory loss), (e) were on anticholinergic therapy (eg, trihexyphenidyl or benztropine), (f) were taking medications that could directly or indirectly impact cognitive functioning (eg, sedatives, anticonvulsants, and/or neuroleptics), (g) indicated prior history of polysubstance abuse, and/or (h) indicated prior history of psychiatric disorder (eg, depression) with or without medical treatment or hospitalization. Informed consent was obtained, and all procedures were approved by the institutional review board.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measures selected for examination in the present study are described below. They were selected because they are the measures from the domains of episodic memory, semantic knowledge, and executive functioning that are most sensitive to early AD in the University of California, San Diego ADRC test battery (see Salmon et al, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within a growing literature on states that fall between normal functioning and dementia, a debate has emerged regarding the true nature of MCI, progression rates, and eventual clinical status ( [4,6,11,12,15,16,18,23,27,30,32,42,43,46,49]). Petersen and his colleagues have accordingly refined their conception of MCI over the years to include four subtypes: Amnestic MCI Single Domain; Amnestic MCI Multiple Domain; Non-Amnestic MCI Single Domain; and NonAmnestic MCI-Multiple Domain [28,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%