2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Am I who I say I am? Unobtrusive self-representation and personality recognition on Facebook

Abstract: Across social media platforms users (sub)consciously represent themselves in a way which is appropriate for their intended audience. This has unknown impacts on studies with unobtrusive designs based on digital (social) platforms, and studies of contemporary social phenomena in online settings. A lack of appropriate methods to identify, control for, and mitigate the effects of self-representation, the propensity to express socially responding characteristics or self-censorship in digital settings, hinders the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such approaches hold potential to reduce appearance, gender, and race biases that influence selection decisions. Other researchers claim to have outperformed IBM Watson PI, Schwartz et al (2013), andPark et al (2015) in predicting personality from social media posts, but higher accuracy has only been achieved when language features were combined with self-reports of attitudes and behavior as predictors of self-reported personality (Hall & Caton, 2017). To our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the convergent and discriminant validity evidence of language-based personality assessment with self and observer ratings of personality in the context of a video interview.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Such approaches hold potential to reduce appearance, gender, and race biases that influence selection decisions. Other researchers claim to have outperformed IBM Watson PI, Schwartz et al (2013), andPark et al (2015) in predicting personality from social media posts, but higher accuracy has only been achieved when language features were combined with self-reports of attitudes and behavior as predictors of self-reported personality (Hall & Caton, 2017). To our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the convergent and discriminant validity evidence of language-based personality assessment with self and observer ratings of personality in the context of a video interview.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Similarly, we examined the impact of age on the personality models by performing the analysis for a balanced population of the three different age ranges. We conducted this procedure by randomly sub-sampling the population of [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] year old individuals to match the population size of the group with the lowest number of individuals (i.e. [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] year old group) and repeated it 10 times.…”
Section: Feature Selection and Model Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Наравне с описательными исследованиями появились и те, которые пользуются методами лингвистического и стилистического анализа для обеспечения безопасности в интернет-пространстве и противодействия компьютерным преступлениям. Холл и Катон [Hall, Caton, 2017] рассматривают метод LIWC (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count) для выявления самопрезентации и цифровой идентичности, а А. Воробьева [Воробьева, 2017]…”
Section: э сирмаи медиасоциологияunclassified