2016
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AMAS: a fast tool for alignment manipulation and computing of summary statistics

Abstract: The amount of data used in phylogenetics has grown explosively in the recent years and many phylogenies are inferred with hundreds or even thousands of loci and many taxa. These modern phylogenomic studies often entail separate analyses of each of the loci in addition to multiple analyses of subsets of genes or concatenated sequences. Computationally efficient tools for handling and computing properties of thousands of single-locus or large concatenated alignments are needed. Here I present AMAS (Alignment Man… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
319
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 580 publications
(319 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
319
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce the systematic errors produced by poor alignment, we used the trimAL v1.2 (Capella‐Gutiérrez et al, ) with a heuristic method to decide which is the best‐automated method to trim the alignment of the WP. All the 80 CDSs of each plastome were extracted separately by Geneious Prime; the alignment of each gene was concatenated by AMAS (Borowiec, ). Including 31 plastomes downloaded from NCBI, 81 plastomes were aligned by MAFFT v.7.409 (Nakamura et al, ) with default parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the systematic errors produced by poor alignment, we used the trimAL v1.2 (Capella‐Gutiérrez et al, ) with a heuristic method to decide which is the best‐automated method to trim the alignment of the WP. All the 80 CDSs of each plastome were extracted separately by Geneious Prime; the alignment of each gene was concatenated by AMAS (Borowiec, ). Including 31 plastomes downloaded from NCBI, 81 plastomes were aligned by MAFFT v.7.409 (Nakamura et al, ) with default parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We visually identified alignment blocks that differed between DNA‐based and transcriptome‐based sequences; these may result from post‐transcriptional modification processes, and so we deleted the divergent sections of transcriptome‐based sequences. We also obtained summary statistics on gene alignments using AMAS (Borowiec, ), including length, missing data, and number of parsimony informative sites (target gene summary statistics are available in the Dryad Digital Repository; Soto Gomez et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To incorporate this variation, we extended each target by 200 bp on both ends and merged regions that were up to 1 kbp apart, increasing the total data set from 54.3 to 163.4 Mbp. As above, we first used RAxML (GTR + Γ, 200 bootstrap replicates) to estimate an ML tree per chromosome by extracting extended targets using bedtools v2.2.5 and combining regions with AMAS (Borowiec 2016). For these data, no alignment is required because indel variation is not incorporated into the pseudoreference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%