Ambient noise levels in north central Italy

Abstract

The characteristics of background seismic noise in north central Italy have been investigated by means of velocity power spectral analysis within the frequency range 0.1–15 Hz. The method proposed by McNamara and Buland (2004) has been applied to estimate the probability density function (PDF) of power spectra computed for ten different stations. Since the target region is the most industrialized area of Italy, a large variability among the power spectra for different sites is observed in the frequency range 1–15 Hz, with the noise levels at two stations exceeding the New High Noise Model (NHNM) of Peterson (1993). The 95th percentile of the PDF varies from −165 to −125 dB (relative to (m/s)2/Hz). This variability could significantly affect the detection capabilities of a network installed for recording the small to moderate size seismicity occurring in north central Italy. We also observed that the dispersion of the powers, estimated at each site as the difference between the 95th and the 5th percentiles, shows a positive trend with frequency that can be ascribed to the diurnal variation of the background noise levels. In the frequency range 0.1–1 Hz, the dominant feature is the double frequency (DF) peak of microseisms generated by oceanic storms. At one of the considered stations, the seasonal variability of the maximum amplitude of the DF peak has been observed in the period from April 2004 to December 2005. Considering the barometric maps provided by the UK Meteorological Office, we observed that the strongest powers in the range 0.10–0.25 Hz occur when intense storms are present over the North Atlantic Ocean, whereas the measurements of the height, frequency, and azimuth of the sea waves at two buoys of the Rete Ondametrica Italiana deployed in the Adriatic and Tyrrhenian seas suggest that the DF microseisms in the frequency range 0.25–0.50 Hz are generated by storms over the Mediterranean Sea. Finally, the analyzed region is characterized by two large‐scale geologic features, namely, the Po Plain and the Alps. The impedance contrast between these two units causes a noise reduction of about 10 dB in the frequency range 0.2–0.6 Hz.

Swiss-AlpArray temporary broadband seismic stations deployment and noise characterization

“…It is well known that in the Po plain the seismic ambient noise is particularly strong (Marzorati and Bindi, 2006) and difficult to avoid. The general geological setting, site-effects and man-made activities make the noise level at high frequency one of the highest recorded throughout the whole experiment.…”

Seismic Ground Motion Amplifications Estimated by Means of Spectral Ratio Techniques: Examples for Different Geological and Morphological Settings

“…Station 1 (Figure 4, top panels), installed in correspondence of a site that approximates enough a 1D configuration, exhibits a clear amplification peak at frequency between 2 and 3 Hz that (also considering the results showed in the next paragraphs) reflects the site response of the site. On the contrary the very narrow peak at 1 Hz reflects probably amplification of cultural noise typical of Northern Italy region (Marzorati & Bindi, 2006). The site does not show preferential direction of amplification (see polar plot in the top right panel of figure 4, but also the low dispersion of amplification functions) and no differences between results obtained considering signals recorded during winter and summer.…”

“…The site does not show preferential direction of amplification (see polar plot in the top right panel of figure 4, but also the low dispersion of amplification functions) and no differences between results obtained considering signals recorded during winter and summer. On the contrary station 2 (Figure 4, middle panels) shows a low frequency amplification peak (around 0.2 Hz) clearly dependent of seasonal cycles, being the peak detected in winter more amplified with respect to the same related to summer: this phenomena is explained with microseisms amplification due to meteorological perturbations during winter (Marzorati & Bindi, 2006). The right middle panel of figure 4 shows a slight polarization effects at low frequency direction 60°-240°.…”

Seismic response of an 8-story RC-building from ambient vibration analysis

“…McNamara and Buland, 2004;Marzorati and Bindi, 2006) computed for the power spectral values are shown in Figure 5. The PDF shows that, for frequencies above 1Hz, the level of noise during the measurements is close to the upper limit of Peterson noise model (Peterson, 1993), and well above the self-noise of the instrument (e.g.…”