2017
DOI: 10.1002/2016jb013769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambient noise tomography across Mount St. Helens using a dense seismic array

Abstract: We investigated upper crustal structure with data from a dense seismic array deployed around Mount St. Helens for 2 weeks in the summer of 2014. Interstation cross correlations of ambient seismic noise data from the array were obtained, and clear fundamental mode Rayleigh waves were observed between 2.5 and 5 s periods. In addition, higher‐mode signals were observed around 2 s period. Frequency‐time analysis was applied to measure fundamental mode Rayleigh wave phase velocities, which were used to invert for 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
38
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general higher mode Rayleigh waves arrive earlier than the fundamental modes. This has been documented in other studies such as Wang et al (). For a similar aperture, large‐N array, Wang et al () found the average Rayleigh wave phase velocities at around 3.98 km/s for 1.5 s and 4.42 km/s for 2.5 s across Mount St. Helens.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general higher mode Rayleigh waves arrive earlier than the fundamental modes. This has been documented in other studies such as Wang et al (). For a similar aperture, large‐N array, Wang et al () found the average Rayleigh wave phase velocities at around 3.98 km/s for 1.5 s and 4.42 km/s for 2.5 s across Mount St. Helens.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This has been documented in other studies such as Wang et al (). For a similar aperture, large‐N array, Wang et al () found the average Rayleigh wave phase velocities at around 3.98 km/s for 1.5 s and 4.42 km/s for 2.5 s across Mount St. Helens. We conduct a dispersion calculation for Rayleigh wave phase and group velocities of fundamental and first higher mode using the same velocity model in Figure for WRA (in supporting information).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The Spirit Lake and Spud Mountain plutons to the north of MSH have been extensively imaged by previous geophysical studies, including local earthquake tomography (Lees & Crosson, ; Moran et al, ; Waite & Moran, ), ambient noise tomography (Flinders & Shen, ; Wang et al, ), controlled source tomography (Figure S17; Kiser et al, ), magnetotellurics (Bedrosian et al, ), gravity (Williams et al, ), and magnetic surveys (Finn & Williams, ). However, the increased station density of the iMUSH broadband array provides improved constraints on the size and depth of these anomalies, especially those farther from MSH that have not been analyzed by previous seismic studies, namely the Silver Star pluton and the McCoy Creek intrusive complex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These anomalies do not appear in the 3‐D Vs model, perhaps due to resolution limitations. However, there is a high‐ Vs anomaly to the west of Marble Mountain imaged by ambient noise tomography using the dense iMUSH Nodal array (Wang et al, ). A local earthquake tomographic study by Lees and Crosson () also imaged high‐ Vp features in the region to the south of MSH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near MSH, several local tomography studies have imaged an upper‐crustal magma chamber at 5‐ to 8‐km depth with limited resolution in the lower crust (Lees & Crosson, ; Waite & Moran, ; De Siena et al, ; Kiser et al, ). Wang et al () used ambient noise methodologies to image low velocities in the upper 6 km near the MSH edifice, using a small‐aperture high‐frequency Nodal array concentrated within 15 km of the MSH summit. Regional studies give hints of a region of partial melt in southwestern Washington between MSH, Mount Adams, and Mount Rainier from active‐source seismology (Kiser et al, ), magnetotelluric imaging (Bedrosian et al, ; Hill et al, ), and regional ambient noise tomography (Flinders & Shen, ).…”
Section: Tectonic Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%